Holcomb Energy Systems:Breakthrough technology to the world

[Ufopolitics]

If you insist.  Let me take another look.  Must have missed something...

In my case, I have two Block walls, sitting directly under high current flat coils.  Coils are arranged to oppose each other as partzman suggested.  The dipole forms away from the coils, centered between them.

In total I have three coils spaced 120 degrees apart.  I only switch on two of them at any given time.  It's pretty simple.  There are six states of coil energizing that develops in a pseudo rotation which is easy to see with a compass.  Each coil stays on for two cycles.  I switch the coils clockwise and the rotation of the dipole turns counterclockwise.  It's a neat gizmo though I'm not sure it's going to tell me anything we don't already know.

Hi Dog One,

You meant "Bloch" walls not Block walls right?...It was given that name based on his discoverer, Felix Bloch.

So would this magnet in your "imaginary" example be approximately the length of one half the circumference of your toroid?

Not necessarily, it could be less than half...it depends on the number of exciter coils used to build up that "imaginary magnet"...and actually there would be two "magnets"...

Still confused how we could get a DC output.  Only a changing magnetic field as seen by the conductor can produce an EMF in the conductor, which implies the change is always getting stronger or always getting weaker.  I just cannot visualize this happening with a magnet of fixed field strength.  If we kept pushing more and more, stronger and stronger magnets into the tube, then yes, we would get a DC output.  Otherwise I just can't see it.

It is simple, just one magnet passes a specific portion of the coil, (according to magnet length) which would be induced, the rest of coil will act just as the conductor to output.
We have been tought Lenz as a "Push-Pull" operation, or "Double Action" piston type where is always a reciprocating movement.
Yes, say we approach a Magnet front North Pole to an empty Coil and Current will oppose the Vortex of that Magnetic Field, generating another North Pole...which repulse magnet...right so far?
What about if we do not pull away magnet (as in Fig 1.B below), but keep pushing it until it fully aligns with coil?...and then keep pushing it further?
What happens is that magnet would be thrusted (acceloerated) out of coil in the same direction of the movement.

Hope yoou understand this now.

Regards

Ufopolitics

Edit: Image downloaded from the web shows North as Red...I use Blue for North on my image below...which could show slight confusion, however, it is same Vortex rotation for North.

[listener192]

Hello L192,

Guessing you meant by "an electrical rotating rotor" as a non mass rotating rotor, where it is just the magnetic field spectrum rotating, correct?

Now, my question is simple:

Have any of you guys (who oppose to this claim) done this test yourselves?

Only those who have built and done such claimed test, could be able to refuse it.
And of course, present your test video as a refusal proof.
Otherwise is pure air blow...
Plus, it is not "any" rotor, but must match* the number of salient poles on the stator, and so, *matching not necessarily means having same number of, but being multiple of such number.

Ufopolitics

Rotor yes, as you stated above.


However would you not agree that a replication of Holcombs patent i.e the 16 salient pole rotor would be a violation of the patent, without Holcombs permission?


L192

[Ufopolitics]

Rotor yes, as you stated above.

However would you not agree that a replication of Holcombs patent i.e the 16 salient pole rotor would be a violation of the patent, without Holcombs permission?

L192

A Violation of a Patent, would take place once you start marketing the same idea...for your own profit.
Or You start building these Generators and start selling them openly on the market.
This does not apply to replications with the purpose of "proof of claims", testing, experimenting, etc,etc...on the contrary, it would be backed up either way.

[ramset]

Am I allowed to write this?

With regards to all current scientific knowledge, that claim is impossible.
bi

Sir
Being the ultimate keeper of scientific knowledge in today's world?
Not even remotely possible!


It changes by the ( nano?) second in today's world...
Your contributions are appreciated
Since you lack first hand access to working units delivered to "mostly " happy customers...Best to relax with generic defamatory statements !
Time will tell just how wonderful (or?) claims are !


Soon I am told !
Respectfully
Chet K

[bistander]

Hello L192,

Guessing you meant by "an electrical rotating rotor" as a non mass rotating rotor, where it is just the magnetic field spectrum rotating, correct?

Now, my question is simple:

Have any of you guys (who oppose to this claim) done this test yourselves?

Only those who have built and done such claimed test, could be able to refuse it.
And of course, present your test video as a refusal proof.
Otherwise is pure air blow...
Plus, it is not "any" rotor, but must match* the number of salient poles on the stator, and so, *matching not necessarily means having same number of, but being multiple of such number.

Ufopolitics

kolbacict did this.
bi

https://overunity.com/19069/holcomb-energy-systemsbreakthrough-technology-to-the-world/msg572172/#msg572172