Holcomb Energy Systems:Breakthrough technology to the world

[Lottalead]

More useless diagrams and uneducated claims, basic KEY questions remain unanswered.

https://overunity.com/19069/holcomb-energy-systemsbreakthrough-technology-to-the-world/msg578963/#msg578963

In the supposed Holcomb generator

1) What exactly is shielded, how many layers of mu-metal and of which thickness
2) What is the use of inner stator

According to shown 4 poles it appears to produce same rotating field as outer stator,
supposedly sandwiching the "secondary" N to N, but there is no proof of this, this is
purely my conjecture, guessing.

3) How exactly is lenz drag reduced / almost eliminated. Shield is almost certainly
playing a big role in this, but nothing is explained, nothing revealed.

How bout some CLARITY and TRANSPARENCY.

I am personally not interested in Holcomb and consider it inferior to other methods,
but since some here claim to "know" what Holcomb is doing, they should at least give
answers to these basic, KEY questions.

Hi Nix, I see you're enjoying your day! Good for you!
It's too bad your not "interested" in the HES tech... I'd hate to see how much time and money you would spend sharing your analysis.. in depth, ad nauseum... 
You demand answers to"key" questions... 
Answer this....
Lets pretend you discovered the HES tech and YOU know the implications of what this means to the World...
Who would you trust?
What questions would you answer?
From whom?
The Holcombs and their team, Astra and theirs, are a force of Good in the World.
There is no lying in them.
I am going to bank on it.
Enjoy the evening!
LL

[dsquared18]

I totally agree with Lotta & SL... those with no interest in Holcomb surely have better things to do than pollute this thread.

D²

[SolarLab]

OK, I'll put it in newborn terms for you so you can understand it clearly:

I have read the patents and watched the videos and analyzed them in depth and posted it all here, you have been participating back then and you missed it all, you idiot.

As i have written he does not say how he reduces lenz, he only vaguely HINTS at it with

"In accordance with another aspect of the power generation, systems and methods are disclosed for reducing drag in an electric generator that includes a geometric design of the stator, placement of a unique series of "uni-polar" solid-state rotors in relation to the stator coils along with magnetic shielding which results in minimal destructive interaction of the rotor magnetic fields with the magnetic fields of the stator when the generator is connected to an electric load."

That is VERY vague. So no, NOT all is in there. Almost nothing is really there. All that he really said is "geometry and shielding" and there is nothing new about these in overunity world.

I have watched the videos and read the patents and understood them as much as it is possible to understand them in accord with available information. I posited the key questions

1) What exactly is shielded, how many layers of mu-metal and of which thickness
2) What is the use of inner stator
3) How exactly is lenz drag reduced / almost eliminated.

You can't even address these basic questions.....

It is not about complexity or simplicity, you idiot, i am working with principles and systems of such complexity that would overload your hollow skull in split second, it is about CLARITY, INTELLIGENTLY and SINCERELY making a clear distinction between what is given and what has to be conjectured.

You claim to "understand" it yet are incapable to answer even the most basic questions about it, you are a fool.

Nix,

Just to shut you up and hopefully get rid of you:

1. MuMetal does what? - It shields magnetic fields!

Why use it? In the LinGen, it shields the pulsed created sliding magnetic
field created spurious signals from the sensitive RF/IF/AF circuits (RF uV input
for example). Do a Fourier Analysis of the LinGen Controller signals and it will
become very clear why they need to be shielded from the RF.

In the rotating generators Holcomb developed he used MuMetal to shape the
magnetic fields.

2. Why use an Inner Stator? - One stator gives you a factor of X1, two stators gives
you a factor of X2 for the same amount of fixed rotor fields. Since the system is
round, it's hard to get more than X2. Unless:

By using many concentric rotor/stator stacks allows taking advantage of the full winding
of both the rotor poles and stator lap windings (somewhat similar to the Gramm generator).

3. Lenz, or rather BEMF, a.k.a. Generator Drag reduction? - By not having the live
rotating magnetized rotor sweep past the stator the Lenz effect is mitigated. This
can also be controlled in a stationary system by the control sequence (truncation),
amongst other methods.

Now, with the LinGen; you can stack them (they're flat) and use other interesting
shapes and combinations.

See, not that hard to figure out was it... but you have to study and analyze it!

I'm sure you still want to argue but go off to another thread and argue with some
else, please...

SL

[nix85]

Hi Nix, I see you're enjoying your day! Good for you!
It's too bad your not "interested" in the HES tech... I'd hate to see how much time and money you would spend sharing your analysis.. in depth, ad nauseum... 
You demand answers to"key" questions... 
Answer this....
Lets pretend you discovered the HES tech and YOU know the implications of what this means to the World...
Who would you trust?
What questions would you answer?
From whom?
The Holcombs and their team, Astra and theirs, are a force of Good in the World.
There is no lying in them.
I am going to bank on it.
Enjoy the evening!
LL

Hi Lottahead, i am indeed enjoying my day! Wish you were too!

Firstly, i am someone who studies and works with overunity profoundly. I already know of many overunity principles altho i have not yet built one, but at this point it is mere question of funds, not knowledge.

I have studied deeply deeply deeply for many years to be here, both conventional and overunity side. So i know there are better methods. With that said, i am interested in it (Holcomb) enough to sincerely look into it and ask the key questions which are indeed key questions which i did, not "key" questions, but KEY questions. No need to repeat them and there are others too.

Besides, i am not talking about Holcomb at all anyway, i never said he had to reveal details about his tech. Never said that, never implied that.

Fact is Holcomb only vaguely hinted at the method he uses - geometry and shielding. There are dozens, hundreds of other overunity devices outthere about which FAR MORE IS KNOWN. Many of them in my playlist.

https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLS6CmWwu5VGmYsgX5-2kFtPsE-iIsXj_o

And when someone claims to "know" / "understand" exactly how Holcomb's device works and at the same time is incapable of answering even vaguely, even in general manner, even the most basic key questions about it, then something is rotten there.

You are clearly a 100% non-technical person, fanboy (fangirl?) who only acts as some kind of "moral support" for something you have absolutely no knowledge or understanding of. Instead of "attacking" (in a clumsily masked way) those whom you misperceive to "attack" Holcomb (which i do not), invest your time more wisely, for example - educate yourself about electronics and overunity principles, maybe then you will be able to actually hold a valuable conversation about these matters.

You and your newbie colleague who also has nothing smart to say but pollute this thread with "cheerleading".

Enjoy the evening!
Nix

[SolarLab]

And Nix,

YOUR CLEARLY AN IDIOT... WITH NO TECHNICAL SKILL

Here's a link - just for you!

https://overunity.com/19069/holcomb-energy-systemsbreakthrough-technology-to-the-world/msg579160/#msg579160

BTW, I learned the "name calling" and other "childish behavour" from YOU!
Unfortunately it doesn't seem to work...