Holcomb Energy Systems:Breakthrough technology to the world

[TommeyReed]

Rakarskiy,

The real reason you didn't answer my question is you can build it, basically you're full of it and can't back it up with any real prototype and claims.

Just shows some of these people on these forum are either misleading others down a path where nothing works or hoping others to invest in the Holcomb device because they claim it works.

I have many theories, but I back them up with real prototypes to experiment.

The Holcomb device is getting old and the people who claim it works without any real proof just tells me they have no integrity at all.

Tom

[Sergh]

looking for the right steel.

Motor 1 000 000 rpm without steel:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RB7zzs9x5Og

Rotor bursts from centrifugal force:

https://youtu.be/RB7zzs9x5Og?t=443

[bistander]

bistander, you can save the term "as a rule" for students! There is a separate group of steel for dynamic electric machines, theoretically it can be used for all types of products. But if only it were so clear-cut. The generator has such a moment that is taken into account for the addition of fields, in the motor the fields are closed. The operation of these two synchronous machines is different and very different. About reversibility is a perl of physicists, like "see it rotates", and in fact a good motor is a bad generator (the fact that the motor is put for the function of the generator, is absolutely not an indicator, almost all who faced rewind), and a very good generator, no motor at all: (by the way, the car generator let as a motor, disappointment will be the characteristics of the motor).

Just six months ago, a guy I work with was looking for the right steel. Found it, turned out to be no easy task at all.

So you make a global conclusion from one instance of hearsay of difficulty in sourcing material for some undefined application. OK?

Concerning motor vs generator.
In the development of medium power 100-200kW motors, load testing dynamometer equipment was prohibitively expensive for our operation. The solution was to use two prototypes coupled shaft to shaft via torque sensor. Operate one as motor and other as generator. Both motor and generator ran with equal efficiency, within a few %. Power was looped so only a fraction was required from the grid. And large power was not needed to be disposed from load.

The recent development of electric vehicle motor systems is a prime example of a single machine used as both motor and generator. During regenerative braking the systems work as efficiently as during acceleration. No rewinding required.

Yes, I agree some generators make for crappy motors. Lundel alternator is one. I'm sure there are examples of motors running poorly as generators. Application specific features have much to do with it. But fundamentally, motors and generators are the same.
bi

[bistander]

Not ? Helmholtz,Gibbs FE

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thermodynamic_free_energy
Wiper,blower Wp  consume ? 10% max. !
wmbr
OCWL

For the purposes and intent of this forum, I'd say not.

Unless of course you have your household or car running on such a device.
bi

[rakarskiy]

Rakarskiy,

The real reason you didn't answer my question is you can build it, basically you're full of it and can't back it up with any real prototype and claims.

Just shows some of these people on these forum are either misleading others down a path where nothing works or hoping others to invest in the Holcomb device because they claim it works.

I have many theories, but I back them up with real prototypes to experiment.

The Holcomb device is getting old and the people who claim it works without any real proof just tells me they have no integrity at all.

Tom

What makes you think they don't? Those who are determined are not particularly public, I of desire in this I can not argue. Anyway, the first thing he decided is to follow the letter of the patent, I tried to dissuade him that the laying of phases should be traditional, what is drawn in the patent has no logic. All my simulations led to demagnetization, or rather it will be very problematic to get current in the phase.

At the same time, I am not in favor of using the internal rotor, for a simple model just suitable for the internal stator and external rotor, on the model of mechanical generator type "Umbrella" Forbes (England), which worked at the Niagara hydroelectric power plant (Tesla generators dismantled as crappy). For small generators with permanent magnets mini HPPs, use this configuration.  With this configuration it is faster to get the desired result.