Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



3 dimensional gyroscope shows antigravity

Started by hartiberlin, January 01, 2009, 07:58:37 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 4 Guests are viewing this topic.

TinselKoala

Quote from: Real Boots on August 23, 2014, 11:15:28 AM
I cannot find any discussion anywheres on the Wallace patents, trying to find out if anyone has ever attempted replication of any of the devices in these 3 patents.  If you read them over closely it certainly appears as if Wallace built at least 2 of the devices, the initial experimental setup has test data in the patent, and the heat pump patent is in tremendous detail which leads me to believe it was also built.  Not sure about the gravitational shielding embodiment however as he doesn't go into great detail there.  Why would he indicate that the gravity shield shell should be made of bismuth when there are other materials with much higher densities of unpaired nucleons per volume such as aluminum?  Could it be that aluminum has longer relaxation time of the nuclear spin axis alignment and would therefore not be suitable as conductor of the gravitomagnetic field at such high frequencies? 
Even replication of the specific heat change in a copper sample exposed to the field would give great validity to these patents and should not be overly difficult or pricey. 
I am very surprised that there is not more on the net about these patents! 
You can find the patents here:
http://www.rexresearch.com/wallace/wallace.htm
-boots
Yes, the Wallace antigravity claims have been investigated in some considerable detail by some very well-funded and competent people. All I can say about it is that it didn't pan out.
My own feeling is that Bismuth is specified because it is the most diamagnetic of the metals. As we now know, bismuth is easy to levitate in a magnetic field because of its strongly diamagnetic nature. I think Wallace fooled himself by magnetically levitating or reducing the weight of bismuth structures or parts in his experiments, and believed he was seeing a gravitational effect instead of a magnetic one. Of course many people seem to believe that magnetism can affect gravity actually, rather than apparently.

TinselKoala

Quote from: tinman on October 11, 2014, 07:24:04 AM
Do you mean Sandy kidd ?,who was scottish,and a member of the RAF. He was said to have designed a Gyroscopic Inertial Thruster (GIT),but after many built and tested devices,it never showed the results he had hoped for.

Sam Kydd(the Aussie) is an actor that stared in a film, where a college professor invents an anti-gravity substance.

It is strange how things get all muddled up on the grape vine lol.

Yep, and there are a few video clips on YT concerning Sandy. Pretty clever gyro devices he had, too, sort of combinations of gyros and Dean Drive kind of things. His machines were a class of Forced Precession Gyro systems which are indeed interesting. I have one such here on my bench at the moment that is the closest thing to antigravity I've ever seen. But it isn't, really.

tinman

Quote from: TinselKoala on October 15, 2014, 03:16:12 PM
Yep, and there are a few video clips on YT concerning Sandy. Pretty clever gyro devices he had, too, sort of combinations of gyros and Dean Drive kind of things. His machines were a class of Forced Precession Gyro systems which are indeed interesting. I have one such here on my bench at the moment that is the closest thing to antigravity I've ever seen. But it isn't, really.
Well we could always use acoustic levitation.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Rz6UzqegA6Q

ramset

Tinsel
Quote
the closest_ thing_ to antigravity I've ever seen.
--------------------------
SSoooo
when yah gonna show us your antigravity Thingy ??



thx
Chet
Whats for yah ne're go bye yah
Thanks Grandma

russwr

The lifting / gravity control of mass was already done in the late 1800's , by John W. Keely machinist , inventor and musician in Philadelphia. Lots of documents available. See S V P. Books , and copies of documents. One of 4 different Keely gravity demonstrations was 3 spinning brass flywheels on heavy metal platform as SIRENS . The cup shaped ridges on rims was speed up by forced compressed AIR. When the tones generated was appropriate, Keely slowed down two so as there was an Inharmonic blend of tones in the air on top edges on angle, with certain ratio. The whole unit slowly rose up. The compressor was stopped. The base plate slowly settled down with decreasing RPMS. Why are people not studying the works of Keely? (3 gyroscopes / flywheels are needed not 1 or 2)