Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Serious HES derivative project proposal

Started by Cadman, February 11, 2023, 04:42:40 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

floodrod

Quote from: Cadman on February 12, 2023, 12:52:56 PM
Perhaps a 3PH generator is a bit too involved to start with? This image is a possibility. A stator setup like this would be similar to 4 Lingens. We would lose the benefits of 3 phases and drop 4 coils from the stator, but at this point all we are shooting for is a viable method with minimal parts.

My statement may hold no bearing, but attached is the Holcomb magnetic domain image that they use. It shows divisible by 2.

Nine poles would give three phases nicely, but the magnetic domains would not be divisible by 2, thus forcing two same polarities to be next to each other.

Three-phase should also be possible using six poles. Six groups of six poles to make three phases that are divisible by two. But then it deviates from Holcomb's image in that we have opposite polarities on either side from each other, where his image shows like poles on either side.

If we wish to duplicate Holcomb's exact alignment with this rotor, I think our option would be four groups of nine coils.  This would give us a duplication of his image where we have four polarities, and the two across from each other are alike. But then we lose a phase.

Does all this matter? I don't know. Does he use a deceptive image to hide something, I don't know. These are just my observations though

bistander

Quote from: Cadman on February 12, 2023, 12:51:47 PM
Bistander,

Ok you've made your point. Enough already. If we were trying to squeeze every last joule out of it, there never has been any doubt that electrical steel is better, and I couldn't care less where Dr. Holcomb claims the energy comes from.

Hi Cadman,
So you're not worried about Hc , but Bsat may have a direct bearing on magnetic performance. That is the saturation flux density of the material. Have you any idea of the value for the powdered Fe bonded mixture you intend to use? It could be 50% or less than that of the electrical steel in the stator. Knowing this ahead of time will allow you to compensate with the design of the shape of the rotor laminate, as you call it. Specifically to make the rotor tooth width sufficiently larger than the width of the stator tooth. Not the tooth tip, but the tooth body width. The other "tight spot" in the rotor portion of the magnetic circuit would be the back iron. Because of the circular area aspect, more real estate is available outside the air gap so features can be thicker (to reduce flux density) without sacrifice of too much winding space. This also will make the parts more ridgid and easier to fabricate and wind.
Take it or leave it. Easier to move a line on the drawing than to remake the part.
bi

Cadman

Quote from: floodrod on February 12, 2023, 01:37:12 PM
My statement may hold no bearing, but attached is the Holcomb magnetic domain image that they use. It shows divisible by 2.

Nine poles would give three phases nicely, but the magnetic domains would not be divisible by 2, thus forcing two same polarities to be next to each other.

Three-phase should also be possible using six poles. Six groups of six poles to make three phases that are divisible by two. But then it deviates from Holcomb's image in that we have opposite polarities on either side from each other, where his image shows like poles on either side.

If we wish to duplicate Holcomb's exact alignment with this rotor, I think our option would be four groups of nine coils.  This would give us a duplication of his image where we have four polarities, and the two across from each other are alike. But then we lose the three phases.

Does all this matter? I don't know. Does he use a deceptive image to hide something, I don't know. These are just my observations though

Thanks for that. I was thinking the number of 3 phase coils had to be divisible by 3.

See, I told you I didn't know anything about 3 phase motor building.  ;D


Cadman

Quote from: bistander on February 12, 2023, 02:53:09 PM
Hi Cadman,
So you're not worried about Hc , but Bsat may have a direct bearing on magnetic performance. That is the saturation flux density of the material. Have you any idea of the value for the powdered Fe bonded mixture you intend to use? It could be 50% or less than that of the electrical steel in the stator. Knowing this ahead of time will allow you to compensate with the design of the shape of the rotor laminate, as you call it. Specifically to make the rotor tooth width sufficiently larger than the width of the stator tooth. Not the tooth tip, but the tooth body width. The other "tight spot" in the rotor portion of the magnetic circuit would be the back iron. Because of the circular area aspect, more real estate is available outside the air gap so features can be thicker (to reduce flux density) without sacrifice of too much winding space. This also will make the parts more ridgid and easier to fabricate and wind.
Take it or leave it. Easier to move a line on the drawing than to remake the part.
bi

Thank you bistander,  :)

I have no real idea what the Bsat of the laminate will be ahead of time. I just assumed for a starting point the cross section of the rotor teeth and back iron would need to be close to twice the section of the stator teeth as I can get just to make the permeability better match the stator electrical steel. Working with the powdered iron is going to take some trial and error. There's no way around that when it can't be calculated ahead of time.

It will never be as good as electrical steel but I do know the remanence is much lower than A36 and 1008 low carbon steel, and I believe the coercivity is too.

Who knows, we may get lucky on the first try.

floodrod

Quote from: Cadman on February 12, 2023, 05:57:57 PM
Thanks for that. I was thinking the number of 3 phase coils had to be divisible by 3.

See, I told you I didn't know anything about 3 phase motor building.  ;D

I assume we have 3 criteria's:

1. 3 phase preferably
2. Like polarities opposite from each other as the holcolmb image
3. And even pole number so we can properly alternate polarities without having 2 polarities next to each other.

Then I think the only configuration that works with a 36 pole stator is 3 coils in series per pole.  12 poles.
Then 4 poles would connect together per phase. 

If we want to do opposite poles across from each other- there is other options.  I just don't understand all the dynamics yet..

On a side note- Cadman- when you get time-can you explain the pickup part as you envision it?  I have been reading the Holcolmb thread somewhat,  but so many ideas and predictions have been pitched I would like to hear your breakdown and plan.