Mechanical resonant oscillation as basic overunity method

[perpetual]

No, you did claim that as everyone can see.

Your escape attempts are in vain, your claims are general and unambiguous.

You wrote referring to tube filled with water above the water tank

"The taller the tube the greater the pressure at its bottom."

That is false. Pressure at the bottom is one atmosphere no matter if tube is 1 meter tall or 10 meters tall.

You also claimed in multiple posts that there is no energy gain here, which is also wrong.

Confess your sins.

Nix

[Willy]

this is only a part of the quote but....

1. "So, you claimed pressure at the bottom rises with height of the tube "

2. "and that there is no energy gain here."

                        I will modify my statements from above for you, to this below.

1. "So, you (Willy) claimed pressure at the bottom rises with height of the tube "

2. "and that there is no energy gain here."

No I will not respond to this. More specific please.

1. To eliminate all confusion, you must first describe HERE IN, for me, that tube and the conditions it is under.

2. Only after #1 is satisfied, will I move on to the second.

[Willy]

No, you did claim that as everyone can see.

Your escape attempts are in vain, your claims are general and unambiguous.

You wrote referring to tube filled with water above the water tank

"The taller the tube the greater the pressure at its bottom."

That is false. Pressure at the bottom is one atmosphere no matter if tube is 1 meter tall or 10 meters tall.

You also claimed in multiple posts that there is no energy gain here, which is also wrong.

Confess your sins.

Nix

                                      More precise description please.

Is this tube (high lighted in red above) ....
1. sealed at its upper end ?
2. filled with water ?
3. its bottom end is immersed below the water line of a tank of water ?
4. most of the tube has been lifted above the water line of the tank of water below it ?

[perpetual]

You are clearly too immature to admit your mistakes as an adult should. I made mistakes too, i ADMITTED them.

You on the other hand pathetically try to troll instead of simply admitting you are wrong.

In case anyone is not familiar, this is about the principle i proposed starting with this post

https://overunity.com/18434/simple-and-powerful-principle/msg576431/#msg576431

From there onward you can read all my and his posts, it is very clear he denied energy gain in this principle.

And he - referring to the noted principle in which tube is filled with water and is almost completely above the water tank it sits in -  claimed pressure at the bottom of the tube rises with height of the tube.

Well, nope. It does not. It is 1 atmosphere, contrary to your claim.

Your refusal to admit the obvious is taken as an admission that you are wrong.

Nix

[Willy]

You say that I "try to troll".  To be clear, does this mean that you want me to not post here
again ?

                                      a precise description below...

this tube
1. sealed at its upper end
2. filled with water
3. its bottom end is immersed below the water line of a tank of water
4. most of the tube has been lifted above the water line of the tank of water below it

has a vacuum relative to the pressure outside it.  That vacuum is greater near to the top
of the tube than is the vacuum present near to the bottom of that tube.

That vacuum drops to zero at the tank's water line.