Tommey Reed's MEG Experiments

[r2fpl]

There must be at least 500 pages of knowledge contained in that build
of yours Atti.  I'm hearing NMR as well as beat frequencies occurring.
What it looks to me like is something well beyond a simple ZPM.
Looking forward to any discoveries you come across.

Yes it can be NMR as well. There are many devices that can be classified as the same.

[floodrod]

I don't want to hijack the thread, but just sharing what I saw when I built a crappy MEG with laminated iron.

I brought it to resonance where the output shifted 90 degrees.  Then pulling a load from the secondary dropped the input like a rock.  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8HHKFISL5q8&t=2s

I believe pulling a load self inducted to the primary in the form of back-emf.  But many will disagree.  This is one of the many examples that lead me to what I am working with now.  Can we not only harvest Back-EMF, but use it for our advantage.

And I agree-  subjects should be re-studied and all possible configurations tried..  Even if the last explorer ended up in a rut, doesn't mean the path you carve out will lead to the same place.  We will never find what we seek if we don't explore and question everything!

[onepower]

Hey Tommy

I welcome your input, but if I listen to everyone in the past, I would have never got to the place I'm at in life today. We all have a journey and our of path in life and not everyone will see eye to eye.

It's never a waste of time if there is something to learn or try. As you may know, not every build have the same results.

I agree 100% and most don't realize what there up against when experimenting. It's hard enough to fabricate something like this then set up all the electronics but there's more to it.

For example, if we have 6 coils switched individually there are 720 possible switching combinations. If each of the six coils could have 100 different frequencies (1 to 100 kHz) there are now 100 million possible coil-frequency combinations. 1000 different frequencies (1 to 1000 kHz) on each coil yields one million billion possible combinations. If we tried one coil/frequency combination each second it would take us 31,709 years to go through them all.

Which begs the question, how long did the other people experiment for on the MEG and how many different variables did they actually try?.

So I think you nailed it when you said not every build has the same results. Sure it's like winning the lottery but someone somewhere wins it every day...

AC

[TommeyReed]

Hi All,

Agree Onepower, It's odd that you mention 0-100khz when in fact I plan to use 3 phase of switching from 0n-
+/0ff/on-+.

Lets say 3 coils on the left and 3 on the right the possibility can be any switching input/output plus direction, not including frequency.

This is a simple drawing to get a idea....


Tom

[onepower]

Tommy

There is another easier way to test the possible variables. Rather than the extremely slow manual testing I like to program an Arduino to continually adjust the variables and monitor the output. Similar to MPPT (maximum power point tracking) only were trying to find the highest efficiency or COP>1. So if we have variables (X,Y,Z) which the computer is constantly changing we can compare how the variables changed relative to the output.

For example, the basic MPPT logic would be if the output is increasing keep changing the variables in that direction until it's not. When the efficiency stops increasing log the all the values then try changing another variable and repeat. The code is very similar to the Arduino safe cracker code found here...https://learn.sparkfun.com/tutorials/building-a-safe-cracking-robot/all  . In essence the safe cracker keeps changing the variables until it finds something that works similar to what we want, were trying to crack our COP>1.

It begs the question, why dork around with manual testing when a computer could do it thousands of times faster?. So we hit a button and test millions of possible variables giving us the most efficient variables with that setup. Based on this data we can then start tweaking the physical or electric/magnetic setup and run the test again to see how they compare. Not us but our computer compares the data from the different setups giving us some kind of direction. This setup did X and another Y, X was better ergo we should change something to move in that direction.

As well, rather than mess around with Volt/Amp sensors to analyze power I just used a 100w incandescent light bulb and a photodetector tied to the Arduino input to determine output. If it gets brighter as the variables change were moving in the right direction. So this doesn't need to be complicated and a little common sense goes a long way.

AC