Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Magnetic flux motor just patented that creates it's own electricity!

Started by am1ll3r, March 02, 2023, 07:32:40 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 12 Guests are viewing this topic.

hartiberlin

I compiled 2 new videos  from all the data we already have about this motor:

MotoFluxPower.com New patented Permanent Magnet Motor
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7qHOLvSms1I

I made a new video about motofluxpower.com

MotoFlux new permanent magnet motor technology will change the world
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JU2JyE9h5o8


Hope this helps,
Regards, Stefan.
Stefan Hartmann, Moderator of the overunity.com forum

Cloxxki

I'm grateful for learning about this project through your videos, Stefan!

You mention something one-way? A one-way bearing perhaps, input shaft, output, or bopth? That would actually make sense to me, to claim every degree of rotation achieved.

If I see correctly, the input shaft had three inline magnets acting on offset 1-2-3-1-2-3 rotor positions.
I wonder whether 3 is the perfect number geometrically, or whether anything over 2 works, and more might even be better/smoother. In a compact rotor, some intepreference might act up when flux paths get too close laterally?

The shown torque traces seem quite erratic, I wonder why. Also I wonder what the project is trying to achieve by going public at this stage. What do they need to be able to call more more than "proof of concept"? Is it not a runner yet? A tiny battery would loop it, if consecutive cog-overs can be achieved with more torque out than in? Or are rpms and torque achieved still too low to get an alternator to do its job? Waveform too messy to work?
Effects of a flywheel on either input shaft or rotor or both would be fascating to understand.

So what do they need? A big investor to buy it all up for billions? A big engineering company to fix their problems at their own costs?

ramset

Cloxxi
Not to speak out of turn...
Stefan is quite busy with administrative and some other obligations ATM


Here of course our goal is open source,for clarity the LENR community
Which we have members activity involved in ...is also open source ( conferences .. experiments etc)
Those resources and others are being brought together around this claim ( in the works)


Hoping for a good test protocol and hopefully a path ( if tests show merit) to some educational
License agreement?
Nothing ventured nothing gained !
BTW nice to see you around
As an aside Rick at Aaron's forum is rebooting his magnet /gravity Device soon
Will probably look to reboot an old topic here on that ( I believe he has had excellent results to share ?)


Forward ~~~~~>
Respectfully
Chet K
EDIT to cloxxi comment below
This is all conjecture at this point for many reasons ,
Hoping for the best for all involved ( large sums have been offered
In the past to inventors willing to open source a free energy tech )
We shall see ?


Whats for yah ne're go bye yah
Thanks Grandma

Cloxxki

I recently learned that Stefan's facing some hopefully temporary struggles. Him posting those videos once more show what level of legend he truly is. While I thanked him for his work, I was meaning address the whole community with my thoughts and questions, I wouldn't dare to ask his time directly, thanks for stipulating.

I hear you on the open source thing as well. I wish I were the one to come up with a working magnet motor, and I'd like to think that I'd found a way to open source it. Never sure, greed is a great temptress as is megalomania.

We can't change the past (on this time line at least), let alone someone else's decisions.
Even more important than open source free energy, is to actually have technologies compete on price. Crappy open source stuff might be trumped by fierce commercial competition.

The technology in subject is patented however, as you will know. Didn't stop Stefan from allocating his precious time to it. Is their intent to open source it in the end without a pay day first? I'm unsure why they are at the "proof of concept" with big gains in torque at same rpm. That's only a quick battery hook up from having a full runner, surely?
If this patent is not maintained for it to enter into the public domain...cool! Is this promised by the inventor?
If meant to be open source, we'd expect better drawings to come out and help to be recruited?

Are there replication efforts to this MotoFlux tech, is it even welcomed?
Sorry, I can slow the Earth's if I start asking questions...

SolarLab


Messed with the Magnet Motor a bit in the "cartoon show" analyzer and the preliminary
indications are this motor might well work as claimed.


Briefly;

(a.) initially, the rotor magnets are aligned to the stator "poles;"

(b.) the interuptor is rotated (cw or alternatively ccw - but only in one direction;

(c.) this disturbes the "magnetic circuit" (see patent diagrams);

(d.) at a certain RPM of the disruptor, the rotor magnets are moved away from the stator poles;

(e.) when enough movement is attained, the rotor magnets "cog" rapidly to the next stator pole position;

(f.) this "rapid snap action" is where the system gain appears (call it what you will);

(g.) now, this is where the "one-way bearings" are needed - the approaching rotating disruptor must be kept
from causing the backward action of either the rotor magnets, the disruptor, or both - allowed to move only
in one direction;

(h.) so, at what RPM is the disruptor most efficient? This is yet to be determined. Or maybe it's a speed control
mechanism of sorts.

In a strange way it's like the Tesla Pump!

OK, now more beer so I can determine the optimum disruptor RPM vs Magnet Field Strength...

Thanks for watching!

SL