Magnetic flux motor just patented that creates it's own electricity!

[Cadman]

Thanks for the information! Much appreciated.

Thanks to your input here I am contemplating a build. I did notice in the video that your magnets were repelling. The patent drawing field lines indicate attraction, but skimming the patent, nowhere are the poles for the center magnet specified.

Would I be correct in assuming your magnets are all ceramic and not neos? I have neos on hand but no ceramics.

[bistander]

Thanks for the information! Much appreciated.

Thanks to your input here I am contemplating a build. I did notice in the video that your magnets were repelling. The patent drawing field lines indicate attraction, but skimming the patent, nowhere are the poles for the center magnet specified.

Would I be correct in assuming your magnets are all ceramic and not neos? I have neos on hand but no ceramics.

Hi Cadman,
That's because there is no center magnet in Mike's device. He clearly says a number of times that the radial director is steel. As such, it is always attracted to the magnets on the rotor. No repulsion there, or anywhere else in this device.
bi

[sm0ky2]

Thanks for the information! Much appreciated.

Thanks to your input here I am contemplating a build. I did notice in the video that your magnets were repelling. The patent drawing field lines indicate attraction, but skimming the patent, nowhere are the poles for the center magnet specified.

Would I be correct in assuming your magnets are all ceramic and not neos? I have neos on hand but no ceramics.

I did some tests with neos, fields are stronger at close range but the distance is where they lack
Neos fall off along a sharp curve
These old school ceramics have a fairly consistent field at a much further distance
As long as you get the spacing right (close but not touching when they rotate) should work fine with any types of magnets.
Other reason i went with ceramic is the weight
Theyre heavier (not enough because i still added weights on top)




You are correct about my polarity i DID begin my video in repulsion


However they over spin one another and doesnt seem to matter which way it flips


I will point out that at a standstill repulsion provides more starting torque
So to start it up you might want to set it to repulsion
But once its going the rpm's don't lock in synchro
Outer disk can get going faster than the drive magnets

[endlessoceans]

This was over at another thread and I am placing here also because it is to do with leverage also

LOOKS like a working prototype and a genuine inventor

No claims by me as to whether it is more energy out than in but the videos and inventors claims seem to indicate that

Frustrating that many interesting inventions coming from eastern bloc countries.  Im intrigued what their common thread is


Firstly Andrey Ermola from Kharkov. Secondly, its gearbox converts the static mechanical pressure on the gearbox rod into a rotational torque. What does this mean: once you have created a force of a vector plan (for example, a jack) per unit of time and remove the torque. What is the output, connect your business.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0g0FcY-7Fw0&t=173s

https://www.youtube.com/@andreyermola

[sm0ky2]

Don't understand much of that language,
But it looks like an elliptical planetary drive
Newscast video seems to indicate he got the idea from Bessler


Striking similarities when you visualize the magnetic fields


I think what this means is we should spin all wheels as if
we were children on the whirly-go-round (leverage)
Like putting a crankshaft on a crankshaft (William Skinner, etc)