Free Energy Claims?

[TommeyReed]

Hi All,

When will we look at the past claims of free energy and realize 99.9% is a lie?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zSTx_9YoeVI&t=16s

Tom

[Dog-One]

When will we look at the past claims of free energy and realize 99.9% is a lie?

In general, I can't really argue with your statements.  For me though,
forget the 99.9%, I'm interested in the 0.1%.  I just have a strong
hunch the creator of all this wonderment threw us a bone somewhere.
We just have to find it.  And when we do, the game changes.

[TommeyReed]

Hi Dog-One,

I agree, but what I keep seeing is the same old circus popping up every year.

I believe many claims today is all about getting money.

If you have a COP greater then 1, then why not run a loop to produce OU?

Even these new claims on this Motoflux is questionable claiming a cop of 5, why not loop it being so high in efficiency?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JU2JyE9h5o8

Tom.

[SolarLab]

Hi Dog-One,

I agree, but what I keep seeing is the same old circus popping up every year.

I believe many claims today is all about getting money.

If you have a COP greater then 1, then why not run a loop to produce OU?

Even these new claims on this Motoflux is questionable claiming a cop of 5, why not loop it being so high in efficiency?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JU2JyE9h5o8

Tom.

Hi TommyReed,

A little hesitant to even comment here (another story however, for another time).

First off; the "OU" forums are but a very small (probably < 0.001%) portion of the
overall group that are investigating "energy and excess energy" producing methods
and techniques (the sources of even an overview are too numerious and varied to
get into here, but they can easily be found with a little due diligence).

Second; proper development of any product is very time consuming and expensive
requiring, in most cases, considerable resource. As you can appreciate there is much
more to it than cobbling together a bit of hardware and software and turning the
crank.

Engineering, Finance, Marketing, Regulatory, Raw Material Sourcing, Transport,
Manufacturing, Testing, Distribution, End User Acceptance, etc. must be tackled
and completed before any device can reach the consumer and be successful.

This is even much more difficult for a non-standard device using a new concept.

Two examples, of many, that are "in-the-works" at present are "Holcomb's HES"
and "Corbin's Magnet Motor." There are hundreds of others as well.

I've added a link to a video that points out only a very small aspect that relates to
these devices to emphasize the required degree of complexity involved.

Lessons Learned from Permanent Magnet Linear Generator Simulation.mp4
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VlLIRwHCKdI

This video also brings-to-light why recent "excess energy" device development
is beginning to move forward at an exponential pace. Many "old ideas" are also
now being evaluated to determine their viability.

Regards,

SL

[TommeyReed]

Hi SL,

I totally disagree about testing and building anything that you need money to do so.

If you have the skills and some tools you should be able to build any  prototype. There are many people like myself who would help other to build a simple prototype.

This money BS is why people are hesitant to even try to help others. Not to be rude, but when people ask for money because they can't build it themselves and won't give people the information of how to help build a prototype, it really question their true motive!

Many people on this forum would be willing to help, you don't need to have a lot of money to test a theory or even make working prototype.

Some prototypes can even be made out of wood or other cheap materials.

Tom