How Stubblefields Wireless Really Worked.

[ramset]

Joel
Thanks for sharing your work , I suppose any repeatable "gain" anomaly would be
Amazing  ..( if more out than in )
Here a repost from an open source researcher  who follows physics discussions outside
The box
Quote
I highly encourage anyone to watch Distinti's semi recent work.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gZRDSy88SN4
He goes over all of this, where mass and gravity pop out of the equation because of a very simple fact, two spinning charged particles when disturbed create a reaction force which we call mass (inertia to be exact. He provides all the derivations and it's all simple math, no higher special dimensions and wacky mathematics needed.
His work on the standard model is even more cool but currently on Patreon only. When a simple model and equation leads to explaining the masses and magnetic moments of fundamental particles without resorting to a blackboard full of equations then you have something truly noteworthy at hand. And if you think this is doing pseudo isomorphic science where you're not adding any new knowledge or data to the pool, well here is an example: he can predict the magnetic moment of the Tau particle which is a yet unknown experimental value. This alone should trigger people to look further into this especially people at CERN.
I truly believe his work will become the foundation of future scientific progress when mainstream physics catches on and stops beating their dead horse. I truly believe the only reason why distinti is still rambling on to his small community and making small progress is because of his personality. He makes a lot of fun of physicists which makes things difficult when you want smart and respected people in the community to have a look at your work in a respectful manner.  But then again, history tells us it's always the young/new generation that made the biggest impact in science not the old established thinking. Niels Bohr was only 28 when he wrote on the quantization of the electrons energy level. Einstein himself was only 26 and 36 when he published his most impactful papers.
Yet today these papers are seen as gospel and nothing critical can be said of them without being ridiculed as a heretic or nutjob.[/size]
End quote

[stivep]

Quote
I highly encourage anyone to watch Distinti's semi recent work.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gZRDSy88SN4
// This alone should trigger people to look further into this especially people at CERN.//

Can you introduce the  name of the commenter/supporter and his association if possible?


We  often use known to us  phenomena like :
if it looks like a duck and walks like a duck, it is a duck
to explain  something else - but duck belongs to  classical mechanics.
more of it is here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Duck_test

Space Time Curvature  visualized with use  of trampoline is not explained, but only presented so you can "see" that what is invisible.
That is why Bohr atom was  compared to solar system in ~ 1913. It was no television there yet.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mXxsT1ut35Q
why-is-the-bohr-model-compared-to-the-solar-system
This was so convenient, that till today it is often used with note that it really is not like that!!!!
_{rubber sheet analogy -  it have mislead many peoples as it is only analogy and nothing more than that.
There is no physical  fabric of spacetime - it doesn't exist - instead it is just our form  of explanation of mechanisms
that  need to be quickly understood by  some average human animal, while others don't give a damn about it.
https://physics.stackexchange.com/questions/309369/the-fabric-of-space-time}

In minute   1:07 the author makes  assumption that  may   be right in the field of  classical mechanics
but  can't be applied to quantum mechanics.

mentioned by him Ladder_paradox :   https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ladder_paradox
in    1:57     he makes another mistake  light as electromagnetic phenomena has no mass and its only
interaction with matter is collision  where photon  deposits its energy to a mass converting it to heat.

by the way- Length Contraction formula https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Length_contraction
was not stolen by  Relativity  - it was adopted and applied as an leftover of what was right
in outdated model in physics. - like screw from the old wall that  belongs to you, that you replaced with  new one .

__________________________________________________


When we go along the nonsense:
Fluid dynamics and vortex are classical physics phenomena  but
in  5:24  he uses it to reincarnate  Ether/eather telling us  in 5:47 that eather is consumed by matter in vortex.
We can't check it out as properties of eather are unknown and there is no conversion table  available.
by analogy we may say that imperial system is  old and we replace it with much better metric system
- however  the conversion table still exist and  both can coexist  as well.

Based on today's models he is wrong in almost every statement he makes in that video -
6:21  we are told that:  "every particle  of matter is  a stable nuclear reactor and we need to save  human race."
Gushhhhhhhhhhhh... if it is stable  than no worry ..... "it's fine" or "it's all right".  "no problem"
"calm  down". "Don't panic..." 

Stable Particle is not a nuclear reactor is not even an isotope - that can't even explode... period!!!
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nuclear_reaction
Nature likes balance so even isotopes   get into balance  after they throw  not needed .. out..
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Isotope
http://large.stanford.edu/courses/2018/ph241/dull2/

I'll save space in this forum  not going to  more of it.

_{opinion expressed is my own}
Wesley

[stivep]

For all curious about  phenomena around us:
1.   overunity  doesn't exist
2.   the maximum you can get  at the output of any device  is underunity.
      It means if you  deliver to the device or circuit 1W you will get  <1W at output.
3.   that is why Perpetual motion is a nonsense.
4.   anti-gravity doesn't exist.
5.   Energy  or e.g  electrical energy can't be produced or created nor destroyed -energy can only change  its form.
      It means amount of energy in the universe  doesn't change. It is constant.
      Term energy production means only that energy changes its from to the one convenient to us. 
6    Quantum physics is probably the most precise scientific discipline ever devised by humankind.
      https://theconversation.com/seven-common-myths-about-quantum-physics-115029
7.   Radioactivity is not dangerous at all if we think that the gasoline in our car tank is safe.
      In reality basic knowledge  about  the both- is like knowing how to use your kitchen knife safely .
8.   Classical physics doesn't explain quantum physics
      https://iopscience.iop.org/book/mono/978-0-7503-1206-6/chapter/bk978-0-7503-1206-6ch1     
     Great paper   is here  for you to read:
     

2.Quantum physics is the revolution that overthrew classical physics. Describing the
      difference between them is like describing the difference between the Bolsheviks and the Tsars.
       Where do we even begin?

https://www.esalq.usp.br/lepse/imgs/conteudo_thumb/What-is-the-difference-between-classical-physics-and-quantum-physics.pdf
9.   Ether/Eather  doesn't exist
10. Good and spirituality  is not recognized by physics as physics exists and  is functioning exactly the same with or without any knowledge about "it."
      It means that: physics rejects and ignores all that is non-physics  related.
11. We all are animals - humans  belong to mammals.
12. Free Energy means only  Energy that is for Free. like an  energy from sun, wind, heat as long as it is at no charge 
      and there is no tax on it. For example air and electromagnetic wave is for free, but using air to send electromagnetic wave is regulated and/or needs to be licensed
      By FCC  in USA.
13  Patents  are not for free and they  restrict your use of anything you didn't think as of yet, as possible, or didn't patent yet for 20 years in average.   

I hope it helps.
Happy  Passover, Easter, Ramadan
To all of you
Wesley

[kolbacict]

3.   that is why Perpetual motion is a nonsense.
4.   anti-gravity doesn't exist.

The invisibility cap exists.
I want an invisibility hat.

[stivep]

The invisibility cap exists. I want an invisibility hat.

Yes invisibility  technology  exists. So you can be completely invisible  from a certain angle  in ideal case of it.
https://www.wired.com/story/vollebak-invisibility-cloak/
But I do suggest your seasonal or permanent emigration- you have so close to the Free World.
Wesley