Is this the first selfrunning overunity motor w/o batteries ? Mike?s motor

[hartiberlin]

And here the circuit diagram again from
EMDevices.
Note, that the Hall IC and SS Relay ( part 1 and 2) are just sketched,
so they just show their function, but not their real inner workings !

[hartiberlin]

By the way, in which posting did Mike say, he used only 10 Ohms for the resistor
at the trigger winding in front of the diode and the 2st transistor ?
In Bedini?s original circuit the resistor was 7,5 KOhm !

EMdevices please clarify.
Many thanks.

Regards, Stefan.

[hartiberlin]

Here is again the original Cole motor circuit diagram, just posted by John Bedini.
There the first resistor is 7,5 KOhm.

[hartiberlin]

This video is interesting:

http://rpmgt.org/Window1.wmv

[Omnibus]

@Stefan,

I came in late in this discussion but made an effort to read the initial 20 pages in the gnOsis forum as well as some of the latest postings here. I really hope I?m wrong but I have a feeling that this is another, this time a little more elaborate, playing with people?s enthusiasm. We?ve seen things first hand, I?m sure you won?t deny this. Recall Danny from Ohio, recall Torbay or that other guy with the Bessler wheel, recall @mervace etc. This time it appears that the fraud is taking a different approach appearing for some time extremely cooperative and seemingly providing undeniable evidence. Why is he doing this is another story. I hope it?s not paranoia but I?ve a feeling someone is trying to punish ?those cuckoo?s believing in free energy? in an innovative way, in a way that hasn?t been tried before by making it appear he?s cooperative and sharing. At that, in the same breath presenting something obviously overunity while claiming with a straight face it?s not while laughing at the whole crowd of suckers who fell for his scam.

If the above is wrong this so-called @Mike should come forth once again, should reappear from his den and should allow someone to visit him and carry out independent studies of his now-infamous-motor. If that doesn?t happen in the coming days I don?t see why one should try to replicate a phantom. Unless someone other than @Mike has his own data proving more energy out than in even if the motor he has is still not self-running.