Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Is this the first selfrunning overunity motor w/o batteries ? Mike?s motor

Started by hartiberlin, February 14, 2007, 08:30:03 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 8 Guests are viewing this topic.

Peterae

Just a comparison
Looks to me as if his is square, and therfore more turns.
I would say i could double the magnet length on my rotor by putting 2 side by side.

I would also say his is smaller.

dingbat

It looks like you are pretty close.  He is a little tighter at the corners than you.  Other than that it looks like you have it.

db


z_p_e

Guys,

I would appreciate your input on something.

I've been thinking about the k coupling factor in my model, and the real motor.

I've been assuming that the coupling coefficient between the pm-coils and coil-coils is equal.

Not to confuse field intensity with coupling coefficient, wouldn't there be tighter coupling between coil to coil, than from magnet to coil because of the relatively large air gap from magnet to coil?

I am thinking of using a coil-coil k of between 0.5 and 0.7, and a magnet-coil k of about 0.3

What are your thoughts?

Darren

dingbat

Quote
I am thinking of using a coil-coil k of between 0.5 and 0.7, and a magnet-coil k of about 0.3

Since you know you have the coils about right now, how about getting the magnet k by adjusting at the appropriate frequency for voltages that approximately match Mike's?

I guess for the coil to coil you will have to go with .5-.7 if that is what is typical for coil to coil.

db