Is this the first selfrunning overunity motor w/o batteries ? Mike?s motor

[hstearnsjr]

...with odd magnet, you will get half tension since only one magnet work per time in comparison of two in this configuration.

I think the same tension because the same flux has to return through the space between the magnets -- just negative direction.

Correction: for "unipolar" and odd number above is true I think.

In most drawings that show magnet pole polarity, they're all north pole out, and I see most if not all constructions have an even number of magnets on the rotor. Won't the voltages cancel on opposite sides of the coil --am I missing something?  I think an odd number of magnets would be better.

It also seems that if you alternated magnet polarities and butted them up to each other you'd get a stronger field.

[MeggerMan]

Hi Hoyt,

Won't the voltages cancel on opposite sides of the coil --am I missing something?  I think an odd number of magnets would be better.

NO.
If you look the motor with the rotor going vertical:

The coil winding direction on the left is going up and on the right it is coming down, therefore when the coil is energised the flux lines will rotate in opposite directions around the two vertical winding limbs.
Also an odd number of magnets will mean that one magnet will be lined up with the winding correctly and one will not and will be most likely be in the wrong position.
Its all one coil so you cannot switch off one winding.
The design is fine as it is, just needs refining for better efficiency.
Regards
Rob

[esaruoho]

recent john bedini gn0sis post.. 

Mike,
This is great work, It seems you have created a great debate in the energy community, that's good they need it.
As stated these drawings and machines have been on my internet sight since the internet started. I'm not here to find fault in anything you have done. I'm going to point out that unless everybody in this group follows your variation to the T
"They are doomed to failure", In replicating your motor.
The Window Motor is very close to the many I have built over the years, however unless everybody has your exact details, wire size, lengths in feet, switching devices, exact circuit wiring and so on, they will never reproduce it. The first thing to state here is that their is a big difference between efficiency and COP of the system. In the motor you reproduced your efficiency is around 99.9 but the COP is over 100% that is why the "CAP charges" up. The next problem is that your hall device can not work correct, because of the Radiant spike, if you walk away the Hall will soon burn out and that part will hinder your performance.
So I will state for the record right here the Motor section is not over unity and your statement is correct.
The Group needs to understand what they are building, they are building a machine that takes advantage of a simple trigger system, you must supply the trigger to cause the effect to happen. It is that trigger that causes things to happen, it's known as a sharp gradient. Sharp gradients cause normal EM systems to do real funny things since it is not in the normal text. For example the correct sharp pulse can trigger a battery to recharge itself, it can cause a capacitor to recharge itself and so on.
You are dealing with quantum systems when you cause this to happen, and they look totally different from the standard EM systems, when you combine the two you have real trouble.
Normal EM systems are designed to never be over unity and you only have meters and scopes that see only this, you can not see in the Quantum level with your instruments.
The original Maxwell equations allow the production of The term FREE ENERGY, the paper is on the internet and also it can be found on Tom Bearden's Internet Sight.
I'm Not here to have a debate with any people that think they know better, I do not want to discuss the TURBO CHARGER, which was mine in the beginning, I do not want to discuss Glow bulbs, or I think that this is what is going on, because it's not what is going on.
You Have made a great leap in what you did and posted to the internet in this group along with the Video.
John Bedini

[CTG Labs]

Running off battery...

[MeggerMan]

Hi Dave,
Good work.
What voltage/current are you using to drive it?

I have just completed a cardboard mockup to get an idea of dimensions and layout - it looks really crap made from cardboard, but you get the idea.
Hope to get the router table out tomorrow to chop up some 10mm acrylic sheet.






Regards
Rob