Is this the first selfrunning overunity motor w/o batteries ? Mike?s motor

[SPP-48]

@ Sam,

I've already done a similar dimensional analysis as you have done, and I posted my findings. In my analysis, everything fits; no embedding required.

One thing you have overlooked is the flange on the rotor. That is not where the diameter measurement should be taken as you have apparently done.

Darren

Darren
You are right. Mike used a plastic wire spool as a rotor which I have now noticed in this other photo. There is no embedding, but this should not effect the overall dimensions.
Sam

[z_p_e]

There is no embedding, but this should not effect the overall dimensions.
Sam

Right. Your width and height dimensions are exactly what I posted, only yours are in metric, and mine were in imperial. So your rotor diameter dimension is in error, and should be somewhere between 48-51 mm.

How did your troubleshooting go....find anything odd? Is your L3 waveform sinusoidal when spinning the rotor by hand?

Darren

[Peterae]

Hi Sam
the only thing i will say with your diagram something must be wrong with the side elevation view because there should be gaps between the magnet.
Peter

[Peterae]

Some interesting reading.
http://www.explorepub.com/articles/beardon/overunity.html

Peter

[Peterae]

Heres an extract from Howard Johnsons web site relating to Permanent Magnet motors.
Maybe relavent.

When the air gap of the permanent magnet motor is increased, a curious but definite change takes place.  There is a large decrease in the reading at south pole of the armature and an increase in the reading at the north pole. Thus, a Hall-effect sensing probe will give a higher gauss reading at the north pole and a decreasing count at the south pole. This helps explain why the thrust is better with a larger air gap than a smaller one. The attracting field is minimized and will not produce a locking force, while the repulsion of the crescent magnet is great enough to generate a thrust vector component that will drive the armature.

Peter