WOW Searl engine in full effect on youtube!

[bitRAKE]

I don't understand either. Maybe, the recieving coils can be used to get the rollers up to speed; or a motor spins up the stator (as in the russian tests). ~600rpm is not very fast and then device spins by itself. Another idea I was pondering: the rollers/stator are basically some kind of capacitor and non-linear diode combined -- maybe they could be pre-charged and it would just start up when the rollers are inserted.

Much to discover.

Edit:

From the YouTube comments DrTerryMoore (1 week ago), "In the SEG there is no external power source to maintain the rotation of each roller or the rotation of the rotating roller around the ring." and "The magnetic fields of the components cause the motion. There is no need for any external energy input. The movement of the rollers in the complex alternating magnetic fields provide a kind of 'electron ramjet' to create electron movement to generate the electricity."

A slight push is needed to start the rollers and then they keep going - how? It must be the segmented magnetic fields and the copper. As the magnets move an electric field is created in the copper which changes the magnetic field. Magnetic fields attempt to reach a local minimum, but create a wave behind them.

My first test will be to confirm this hypothesis. Has anyone an interpretation of Searl's Law of Squares? I'm compiling what I can about the squares to hopefully link them better to the device and will post my Excel file for people to play with.

[acidbreaker]

A lot of answers is inside this document 
http://www.searlsolution.com/documents/russianseg.pdf

Read it carefully and more times to understand.
Dr Terry Moore wrote on youtube that their people will do graphical animation what is happening with magnetic fileds inside the generator.
How the filds are moving etc..
It will be very helpfull for us to understand the teory.

[bitRAKE]

There does appear to be differences between that document and Searl's description, but it is certainly more coherent. It appears they used different magnetization; copper foil covered titanium on the external layer; ?20kV input power. The tests performed in the Russian experiments seeks to experience the anti-gravity effect rather than power generation.

Also, they claim the speed of rotation diminishes with load; but what bothers me is that they claim to have spun the motor until it self-sustained at 550rpm and then could increase speed without bound. Searl states the magnetic field is instantaneous - the rollers do not have to accelerate - they have a maximum speed based on design and the load reduces speed - no control is needed.

Surely, the multi-segmented rollers with shifted magnet poles described by Searl (line 207-213) are not the same as radial poles of the Russian design. Although the ease of construction is clear.

Searl states the centrifugal force creates a positive pole at the center and a negitive pole on the copper surfaces. Yet, the paper describes applying a high voltage field to the rollers - why?

If the anti-gravity effects were being tested, why have a concrete ceiling? Everything is directed towards restraining the device in these tests? The polarization being used to stablize the output is further proof of this.

The startup power requirement might be due to the thin copper layer (titanium electrical resistivity of 0.420 ?ââ,¬â€°ÃŽÂ©/m verses 16.78 nΩ/m for copper).

Quite clearly these are different devices.

[TheOne]

> Searl states the magnetic field is instantaneous

It's probably because the roller is touching the rotor,even the searl video are only using one stator, you see the roller touch the stator and accelerating, i bet for instantaneous stuff you need at least 2 stator layer and make sure the roller are floating and not touching the stator

[bitRAKE]

I wonder if any Russian speaking people could translate this patent?:
http://rexresearch.com/roschin/rg1.htm

Looks like they tried to patent parts of Searl's technology?