High voltage HHO by IronHead

[Moab]

wow. I'm stoked. I like this angle . Thanks bro . Moab

[d3adp00l]

At 54 volts and 6 amps and 6/7 l per m, that would be 49.8 watts per litre per min. That would be a great beginning.
With a the fore mentioned 160cc engine, 40cc X 49.8 = 1993.8 watts to run the engine with 50% hho/air. So about half the produced power would feed the engine its fuel and half to do everything else. Now thats what I would call O/U.

@d3adp00l
Hey just so you know...This is where I was before I started at uverunity.com.....
150% efficiency
efficiency is good to have.

"My current cell is running off of 54 volts 6 amps and making 6-7 L/m. That's 150% faraday current efficient.

Not too sure where to go next..."

That is GREAT output 324 watt with around 390 liters per hour ( 6/7 l/m)

That equates to 0.8watt per liter of gas produced!

Are you using closed cell application?

[d3adp00l]

The 50% is based off the only info I have seen for hho/air fuel mixture tests. The test wasn't 100% clean, but it was close enough for me to have a good amount of faith that 50% will proly get an engine running well enough to be useful. If someone out there wants to check on it an post a vid I would love to see the data.

@IH Like you said a long time ago, I want to see engines running on this stuff. The more knowledge we all have about what it takes to do so the better.

And just so everyone knows, not all of the info I find is irrefutable, its just info that I have seen in real life, on a credible vid, or well documented by historic science. But I will say this, I don't repeat something that is questionable. If I tell others something I have alot of faith in it. In other words I watch very carefully not to talk out my hind end, and will always side with conservative not boastful.

But if 23% will run an engine then it just means its twice as easy as what I thought.

"It appears that a 50% HHO/air mixture is viable for combustion in an engine"

Hmm, I thought it was 23%.  I know H will burn at a 4% mix; it just won't have much power.  Has anyone seen a chart or formula for power:%mixture ratio?  I know Meyer had some numbers, but I have a problem believing anything he wrote (smart guy but tried to hide everything, so credibility is nil without confirmation).  Anyway, what I remember is someone comparing H to gasolene, showing that gas takes up 3% of the space in the combustion chamber because it is a liquid, while H would need 23% of the space because it is already gaseous.  How they came up with this number is something I do not remember.   The guys that were doing the land speed record using H by having the throttle wide open always and adjusting their speed by increasing the H:air mixture probably had some relevant info,,I just can't recall it.


Guys, I haven't yet done any testing on this, but I would appreciate your thoughts.  We can adjust the amp draw by adjusting the amount of catalyst in solution.  We can also adjust the size of the ss plates.  Are larger plates more productive? Does the size of the plates alter the heat produced? 

IH, playing with this booster is fun and I "think" I am learning some stuff with it, but it is just playing.  What you are doing is way, way more important.

[Moab]

I was not sure anyone was ready for this . But I think from the feedback I will get into this in depth . Thank you,  please watch as much as you can the more you do the more you will understand what I am going to be talking about here on out.

Thank you

Well. there goes the thread for me. hmm , From now on I wont know whht the hell you guys are talking about..

Btw 12k and 22.1k works well for me. Just depends on the moon.

[d3adp00l]

Well it looks as if this little roller coast ride just got to the peak of the first dip and now its time to rip through the ride. And we were all thrilled to death with the climb. Hold on to something...