Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Nick Nelson's magnetic motor ideas

Started by Olli P Taina, September 17, 2007, 01:51:18 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Olli P Taina

Hello everyone,

Has anyone of you studied the magnetic motor ideas of Nick Nelson? http://www.athenapolis.com/NN_FindingtheMotor.htm
http://www.athenapolis.com/NN_MotorintheMagnet.htm
http://www.athenapolis.com/NN_SwitchingDomain.htm

I have also used a 90-degree angle setup in my own experiments and found some unexpected results.
My opinion is that magnetism in general is not very well understood and just like Mr. Nelson writes standard electrical design principles can not deliver a working magnetic motor and the only way to achieve a proper design is - more or less - by trial and error.

BR
- Olli P Taina

hansvonlieven

G'day Olli,

You say:  My opinion is that magnetism in general is not very well understood and just like Mr. Nelson writes standard electrical design principles can not deliver a working magnetic motor and the only way to achieve a proper design is - more or less - by trial and error.
(my emphasis)

You are absolutely right. If you have a good look at history and technological developments you will find that most discoveries were made by trial and error.

Scientists came in later, explained more or less what was happening and collected the Nobel Prizes.

Life IS a bitch sometimes :-)

Incidentally, thanks for the interesting links. Worth following up I think.

Hans von Lieven
When all is said and done, more is said than done.     Groucho Marx

Olli P Taina

Normal procedure for designing an electric motor involves analyzing the interaction between the magnetic fields generated by the stator and the rotor.
Mr. Nelson writes about a third element needed in addition to these "conventional" two elements: stator and rotor.

If we assume that magnetism is in essence a particle flow and this flow of particles always takes the easiest path available it seems quite logical that at the "sticky" point of rotation an alternative route for the magnetism particle flow is needed. If this alternative route gives the particles an easier path to travel they will follow this path until the rotor rotates forward to a position where the "normal" path between the stator and rotor magnets again provides the easiest path and the rotation continues.

Does this sound logical to you?

- OT