New accelerating gravity wheel ! Converted video from www.newenergymachine.com !

[Omnibus]

Many thanks for the big pics.
It seems Bob is still using hydraulics or
air pressure to move his weights inside his frame and
get mechanical acceleration out.

I wonder, if he needs less electrical energy to move the weights
inside his machine than the rotational energy he could extract...

Regards, Stefan.

So, he has external energy input it seems. Is this just to give it an initial boost or has to be supplied continuously?

[4Tesla]

We've tried to get Bob to describe in detail how it works in the past, but would only give out a few details.  He seems to be in this for the money. 

Video 4 is very cool!  He claims it is patented.. on his previous machine I couldn't find a patent.. I'll see if I can find one for these new machines.

4Tesla

[4Tesla]

I found his US Patent Application:
http://www.faqs.org/patents/app/20090051169

Couldn't find images or patent.

Here is his Peswiki page:
http://peswiki.com/index.php/Directory:Bob_Kostoff_Gravity_Machine

In the news:
http://www.thepost.ca/ArticleDisplay.aspx?archive=true&e=683411

4Tesla

[conradelektro]

I do not understand the excitement about this energy converter.

Got to     http://ep.espacenet.com/numberSearch?locale=en_EP
and put   US20090051169     in field  "Number:" , click on the button SEARCH and you will get the full patent description including the drawings.

In the patent description it is declared that the machine converts pressure (of a gas or fluid stored under pressure in a tank) to electricity (see the attached image of the text).

One could argue that the conversion is very efficient. It stands to proof that one gets more electricity out of the machine than it costed to create the pressure in the tank. Which is hard to believe and which is definitely not claimed in the patent.

Is the whole discussion in this topic about this point? It seems so?

I think the inventor wants to use "pressure" which is left over from other activities and which would have been lost by dissipation from the tank.

Greetings, Conrad

[Pirate88179]

So, those hoses and hydraulic tank I pointed out in the enlarged photos of this devices way back in the beginning of this topic turned out to be just that?

This device does not run on gravity alone then as we all seemed to first think? (and were led to believe)

This may actually turn out to be a useful device, don't get me wrong, but thanks to the patents, we now see that it is a converter not a gravity generator machine.

Wow, I wish we knew this for sure a long time ago.

Thanks for the patent research.

Bill