New accelerating gravity wheel ! Converted video from www.newenergymachine.com !

[LarryC]

@All,

I've added the momentum values to the spreadsheet. See Excel attached dataset.

Does anybody know a formula to calculate the Centrifugal slam value?

Regards Larry

[noonespecial]

While Larry is developing his ramp-lift project, here's my latest thinking on an alternate way this could be accomplished without the use of pneumatics. Remember, the drawings are conceptual so don't be too critical . I tried to describe everything in the drawings but if something is unclear, let me know!
Regards,
Charlie

[LarryC]

While Larry is developing his ramp-lift project, here's my latest thinking on an alternate way this could be accomplished without the use of pneumatics. Remember, the drawings are conceptual so don't be too critical . I tried to describe everything in the drawings but if something is unclear, let me know!
Regards,
Charlie

Hi Charlie,

Haven't analyzed the nice drawings yet, but it seems my spreedsheet is misleading. You should be using the CF 1 - 2 column with a value of 15.34 lbs for the fifth inch lift. The CF 1 - 2 column represents the actual force needed to lift the combined weights. Because CF 1 is on the opposite side of the center to CF 2 as they are opposing forces and assist in the lift.

So I am attaching a new version with a Lift for Inch column which should clear it up a little. I've also noticed a problem with the momentum conversion from Kg/meters to Ft/lb, so that has been corrected. Values now closer to Bob K's post.

Regards,
Larry

[noonespecial]

Hi Larry,
The reference in my drawing came from changing the individual weights in your spreadsheet to 20 ea. (as in the drawing) instead of 10. However using the new spreadsheet the CF 1-2 for inch 5 is now over 30 lbs. so that kills my design! However, I noticed that radius 1, inch 1, also changed (I think) from 23 to 29?? Is this because your machine is 5' in diameter? If I change radius 1, inch 1 back to 23" the CF 1-2 drops to 18.4 which then would work fine.
Thanks,
Charlie

[LarryC]

Hi Larry,
The reference in my drawing came from changing the individual weights in your spreadsheet to 20 ea. (as in the drawing) instead of 10. However using the new spreadsheet the CF 1-2 for inch 5 is now over 30 lbs. so that kills my design! However, I noticed that radius 1, inch 1, also changed (I think) from 23 to 29?? Is this because your machine is 5' in diameter? If I change radius 1, inch 1 back to 23" the CF 1-2 drops to 18.4 which then would work fine.
Thanks,
Charlie

Sorry, misunderstood that weight change from 10 to 20. Not sure about your problem, but no change in CF calcs. Should be 29 for Radius 1 and 6 for radius 2. This represents the center of weight boxes. Actual slide is 23. Weight boxes are about 5' diameter, but lift plane may be at 6' diameter to get required ratio.

Regards, Larry