Controller circuit for Hilden Brandt motor needed..

[aladinlamp]

Here is a new video. This time with bigger magnets, to see what that does.
Normal version:
http://www.krystyna.nl/Machine/big.wmv

Smaller version for Jack:
http://www.krystyna.nl/Machine/small.wmv

Regards,
Steven

anybody has these videos, can you upload somewhere?

[nwman]

I know this isn't the best place to ask this questions but I figured one of you would know. I have been researching Jack and Flynn's work and I just wanted to dig into Flynn's claims. I have read from many "believer/seeker" websites that Flynn has a contract with Boeing's Phantom works. My questions is, "where is there documentation/proof that this is true"? I know Flynn's website claims to be working with them but is there a third party validating this information from their own sources? My gut just doesn't feel right about their veracity. I would think that if Boeing was involved they would have taken Flynn's site down. Please feel free to Personal message me with a response due to the differing nature from this thread.

Thanks,

Tim

[Elisha]

Hi Jack,

In your motor  ?if you Have the valve orthogonal to the rotor not is better?

The valves of your motor are on the stator, inside there is the rotor, the valves have form of " C"

By orthogonal I talk about to rotate the valves on its axis 90 degrees.

As the valves are now, it seems that the rotor when approaching them first makes contact with an end of the valve, later makes contact with both extreme, continuous rotating and only does contact with the other end and later with no end.

But rotating the valve 90 degrees, the rotor have contact with both extreme at the same time, and continuous rotating and leave the contact with both extreme at the same time.

Then question is, is better with the rotated valve 90 degrees or as is now?

[JackH]

Hello Elisha,

I have built it both ways in the past.  I have found that it produces more power the way it is. 

Later,,,,,Jackh

[Thaelin]

Hi Jack:
   Just an observation on my part but having the valve the way you do would
on turn on attract the rotor to the first half of the valve and then it would "see"
that there is another and be attracted to that then. Basically you wind up with
two attractions instead of one. Would that be right? First one would have the
whole rotor to see then split with the other half.

thaelin