Chas Campbell free power motor

[tlm6000]

Chas, I have had a similar idea based on the same principles as your gravity machine. I am a mechanical engineer working in the solar and energy field. I had designed the machine before I knew of yours and I was surprised how similar it was to yours. The idea of using torque, or as you say leverage, to move an outer wheel while driving an inner wheel to raise the same weight, a ball, using less torque, that in turn moves back out to the outer wheel seems to make sense. As you mention, timing is involved, and I have incorporated a small time of freefall between the exchange of weights so as to not create a balance that could stop the machine. So I just wanted to say thank you for giving me a boost to keep on going with this project knowing that the idea is real and I applaud your efforts in developing this machine to give to the world. Keep up the good work and hopefully those who spend all their energy trying to stop these technologies will finally expend themselves and give in to help others as well, instead of hindering those who are trying to help others. Hopefully you can get someone to help you get a website going or at least get an email address for those of us who would like to support you in your endeavor.

Tom

[hansvonlieven]

Seeing that someone has brought this thread up again, has anyone else noticed that Chas Campbell and his devices are no longer mentioned on Panacea. I wonder what happened to Ashtweth's star project.

Didn't work maybe??

Hans von Lieven

[hansvonlieven]

G'day P-Motion and all,

I am not quite certain what you are driving at. Do you refer to a common psychological trait amongst PM researchers or what?

Please elaborate a little on your idea.

Hans von Lieven

[sm0ky2]

Hans,

        from what i understand of the theory,  its the appeal for PM, or OU, and its infinite possibilities were we able to achieve it.

this may not apply to many of us who are simply researching, or experimenting for a POSSIBILITY of a PM tech.

It would mostly apply to those persons who have deluded themselves into believing that PM DOES in fact exist somewhere out there, and that if they keep trying they WILL succeed.
There are psychological factors involved in this sort of thinking, and there are people like that on this forum, you can read it by the things they say. - in fact i think they are some of the best contributors to the type of research that's being done here, because they start with the assumption that the device will work, then study it to figure out why it doesnt.

completely backwards approach to what many of us do.

Common psychological traits would most likely be along the lines of:::
  a desire for power, a sense of despair towards their position in society,  a general dislike towards inflation and rising energy costs,  and a misconcieved notion about what PM actually IS.

hope this sheds some light on the theory. im not a psychologist, so i cannot diagnose any one particular person, but im sure each of us have encountered someone who could fit this category.
they treat PM as more of a Religion, then an area of scientific study. thats the best way i can put it. I am not convinced that this psychological ailment ONLY applies to PM, i think people could display similar traits towards another concept, or idealism and it would be essentially the same.

in conclusion:
1) there may be psychological factors influencing PM researchers.

and

2)  This may not be exclusively related to PM/OU, but rather the person is simply displaying  these traits towards their work, and could do the same towards any other area of knowledge or study.

[hansvonlieven]

Good analysis Smoky,

You are right, it is observable here in many posts as you pointed out.

This is not exclusive to PM though, the flat earth research society is another good example of the same thing or the attempt to determine the age of the universe using biblical references.

It reminds me of the Arab conqueror, I forget which one, who destroyed whole libraries wherever he went.

His reasoning was that there could be only two types of books, those who said things that contradicted the Koran, in which case they had to be destroyed on the grounds of heresy, and those who agreed with the Koran, in which case they were superfluous and therefore had to be destroyed as well.

There is little new under the sun.

Hans von Lieven