Chas Campbell free power motor

[tinu]

Ohhh, I almost forgot!

Prepare adding also

...the SMOTs, the Magnetic ICs, the Pulse Lead-out Anti-Graviton cylinders and the Magnesium Grignard Reactors.

[Humbugger]

@tinu

"Some problems keep changing here much faster than an army of ppl can solve them.

Here is my advice, or at least from now on I?ll work this way: do a simulation, calculus, whatever you need to do only after the device is clearly defined and only after getting a firm promise that it is final; no 'minor adjustments or variations' accepted. My 2 cents."

  Problem is, no functional overunity device is ever clearly defined as yet in all of history, so you might get a little out of practice on your skills if you follow your own advice there, pardner!

You sound like me after my first "flat rate package quoted" freelance consulting design project.  I foolishly told the guy he didn't have to pay me until it was finished and working to specs, but he changed the specs a week before I was done...nine times!  It's a real dilemma when you end up working for free...at least you're going in knowing that!

Humb

[zero]

srawofni put up a still picture of a wheel.   I wouldnt call that a defeat.
Sorry, but I dont trust anything that gets posted as fact.  Anyone can
change data and manipulate and fake things, because of vested
interests.

Besides the software not working 100%, he didnt take into consideration
the angled drop pushes, as Ive stated time and time again.

[shruggedatlas]

srawofni put up a still picture of a wheel.   I wouldnt call that a defeat.
Sorry, but I dont trust anything that gets posted as fact.  Anyone can
change data and manipulate and fake things, because of vested
interests.

Besides the software not working 100%, he didnt take into consideration
the angled drop pushes, as Ive stated time and time again.

You keep bringing up these drops.  You must understand there is no free ride with them.  The cost to the drop is that the ball could have already been in the wheel, but instead it waited in position for the wheel to lower to accommodate the angle of the drop.  In the simulated scenario, there is no drop because we assume the ball is magically teleported into position, so there is no reason to angle it in, but nothing is lost this way.  True, the extra momentum of the dropping ball is not imparted to the wheel, but instead the wheel gets to enjoy the benefit of the ball's weight sooner.

And please, no offers to drop a keg on my head or boulder on my back. 

[zero]

The ball is NOT waiting - it IS IN THE WHEEL!!!

  As in my pic above.. you can see the ramp is PART of the
lever,  which is the same as Chas's wheel setup.

When the ball rolls on his down-slanted PVC "intake" pipes, Gravity is still pulling it down
with the same force.   But additionally, when the ball hits the waiting spot - it imparts
the balls extra energy to the wheel.     

The ball has gained energy from rotation, motion, acceleration, and the ability for near
free-fall speed (which the wheel would otherwise restrict).   


Just like my pic,  the teeter which has the ramp will gain more energy output.
And just like my pic where THE RAMP IS PART OF THE MOVEMENT DEVICE,
(IE:  ITS NOT WAITING TO IMPART GRAVITY!!!)  Chas's device works the same
way!!!

To say otherwise is a rejection of physics!