Chas Campbell free power motor

[zero]

Only the skeptics armchair negatory comity want him back... or,
one of his 15 other fake supporters accounts that are begging for himself
to get back as his main account.

[shruggedatlas]

I challenge the Humbugger bashers to find a single post where Humbugger was wrong.  Is there only room on this forum for the preacher and his choir?

[hansvonlieven]

G'day Smokey,

You are correct in what you are saying, if you want to take it a bit further have a look at George Constantinesco's work in the 1920's. It has all relevant stuff of Milkovic's right there in his patents and real world applications.

It would seem that the Serbian Patent office do not check foreign precedents. Milkovic's patents are not worth the paper they are written on.

But we really should not be discussing Milkovic in this thread. Sorry Stefan.

Hans von Lieven

[derricka]

Here is THE SOLUTION to the puzzle How Can This Be True?
The upper line of each triangle appears to be straight (an optical illusion) when in fact, they are very slightly curved.
The line in the upper triangle sags very slightly reducing the area of the total triangle.
The line in the lower triangle balloons upward very slightly, expanding the area of the total triangle.
This forced difference in area between the two total triangles adds up to exactly one square.
Cheers,
DerrickA

P.S. The solution to many apparent paradoxes like this puzzle, mobius strips, klein bottles, Escher drawings, etc. lie in subtle dimensional shifts not easily noticable to the casual observer.  This fact can be used both for and against the case of free energy.

[sm0ky2]

Gravity Wheel:

The ratio of the Outer diameter of the Inner wheel (where the ball falls into the upward scoop)
should be at 1:2 to the Inner diameter of the Outer wheel (where the balls descend).
The number of balls is not very important, so long as they are spaced radially-symmetrical, so that the same number of balls fall, as are rising.

Important to note is the Mass of the balls. The cummulative mass of 1/2 the number of Descending balls that import gravitational force on the wheel at any moment in time must be sufficient to move the mass of the wheel with no other balls on it.

This is also the ammount of mass that we may pull our excess energy from. (theoretically).
example: 3 descending balls, with a 2 to 1 leverage and 3 ascending balls.
The 3 descending balls impart 6 units of force onto the wheel, 3 (3.00001) units of force are used to lift the 3 ascending balls, leaving us with 3 units of force. If our whel is designed such that it requires 3 units of force to turn it, then we will have a net energy value of 0 and our friend friction will bring it to a stop.

IF  3 units of force are MORE than is required to move the wheel (less wheel mass? better bearings? no load?)
     Then we will have an excess of force imparted on the wheel. - Think this over and let me know what you think.

as i mentioned earlier, the angle of the horizontal planes determines the RPM (multiple balls in the "waiting" position can counter this effect), and you want the Drop Point on the ascending side to be as high as you can, Top Dead Center would be ideal, but this may cause a problem in the extra momentum consumed in bringing the balls around that much further.  On the same note you want your recieving point on the descending side to be as high as possible. so you have a small range of angles to play with, and moving the horizontal ramps vertically until you find the right position, TIMING is very important, one ball MUST drop into the recieving bucket on the descending side at the SAME TIME as a ball is picked up on the recieving bucket of the ascending side.
ALSO one a ball MUST be dropped off at the drop point on the descending side as the SAME TIME as the ball is being dropped off at the top of the ascending side.  Ideally you would have all 4 balls going onto/off of the ramps at the same time, to reduce wheel instability.

if i can figure out how to post a picture on this thing i can illustrate this, but its basically the design that was posted several times earlier. If the mass of the wheel is considerably less than the mass of 1/2 the number of working balls there will be excess energy - in theory.