Successful TPU-ECD replication !

[abassign]

Salve Otto & Roberto,

I am noticing, with worry, like is increasing the complexity of apparatus TPU. The operation principle cannot be searched through the greater complexity, but only through a careful analysis of the elements that have competition to the brust of energy, that you found, like I read in the main document.

You are trying to comprise a physical phenomenon, not been planning a Microsfot software   , physics does not go towards the complexity, but towards the maximum simplification.

For example, I noticed that the TPU-ECD device is similar that one constructed from Cooler, the skema as ring, the windings etc. If the experiment of Hans Coler ( http://www.geocities.com/CapitolHill/3752/hcoler1.htm) is not a fake, your experiment have many similar things.

Ciao
Adriano

[otto]

Hello all,

@Bruce

I tried really hard to connect the other 2 controls but its IMPOSSIBLE!!!!

The current from the power supply jumps, the light is lower, a lot of problems.

This IS the reason I builded 3 Mobius collectors in the hope to connect then my collectors and controls somehow and then have the combined output.
And what Im doing is logical because to have a self runner we have to feed back a tini bit of the output power back to the input. In this way its possible.

@Adriano,

dont worry, Colers Patent is NOT a fake. It has just to be understand.

In my oppinion is the TPU not sooo complex. Just a few coils and collectors. Hmmm...

Otto

[ronotte]

Hello all,

@Otto,
you are right, I've still not tried to put the output secundaries in series or parallel but as this's interesting I'll try it this evening. Please let us be updated about your triple big-eye advancing.

@Darren,
- first simulation step of course is OK but just to check all the standard stuff.

- second step, not so standard, with 2 freqs is to verify that now the peaks are summing up like in the two pics you find attached. That's very IMPORTANT. Please check it also varing the freq i.e. 1st & 2nd harmonic. Now I've not time but soon I'll give you the exact test freq to set in the model.

Roberto

[wattsup]

@ronotte and @otto

I have just purchased a BK Precision function generator off of Ebay and I have another one in sight. Also, I have now secured someone who will be making the circuits plus a host of other control circuits that I am presently writing the logic requirements.

This will enable me to do alot more testing in many other ways than the present design proposes. I can't wait.

I have a few questions, mind you that yes I am an electro-nyophite, but these questions would assist me in better understanding certain reasons around Otto's circuit.

1) Does the mosfet adversly affect the quality of the frequency coming from the frequency generator? Have you scoped the frequency before and right after the mosfet to see any difference in the purity?

2) Can the frequency leaving the mosfet/driver be directed to the positive side of the primaries instead of the negative side?

3) Can you explain the reason why you are using the mosfets and the driver or how the mosfet and driver are being used in this circuit.

4) Can the frequency be directed to a loop that is not connected to any other wires or power source, without the mosfet/driver. Just a straight frequency fed to a closed loop ring or mobius.

I am attaching a diagram I have been working on since two weeks now, running along the ECD general set-up but with a twist. The power in, load and frequencies can all be on separate lines. Also the load and frequencies can be switched around so you can try sending F1/F2 into the rings and load off the secondaries. The short at T1 can be timed to disrupt power before the current gets to the coil end. I am not sure but maybe a zener diode can be used at T1 to create a short. When the short occurs, power goes to zero, so the zener starts over and over.

I don't think the frequency is sent into the DC circuit at all since it results in dumping most of the power to ground. I think it is used to create a vibrating magnetic field, trying to make it more dense to capture maximum ether. A frequency is already a form of pulse. There is no point pulsing it as well. But you should pulse the dc to create maximum collapsing fields. The short is Erfinders style setup but this can be done in other ways.

[MeggerMan]

@Wattsup,
You need the mosfet driver because it has a very low input capacitance where a mosfet has a very high input capacitance.
This may not sound like a problem but image your mosfet as being an empty bucket and your mosfet driver is a tea cup.
You can turn on the tap and fill your tea cup up very quickly but filling up your bucket means waiting a long time.
If you turn your tap on too fast the water board company (function generator) complain that you are using your water too fast and cut you off (output stage overheats and shuts down).

@Roberto,
I finished building my first DDS 20 kit last night.Ã,  When you come to solder the metal RF screening can in place make sure you do not have the LCD display and rotary encoder soldered in as it is difficult to get at the corners of the RF screen.
When you start the DDS 20 up for the first time make sure that you press the "mode/save" button for more than 5 seconds to enter the setup.
You can then just accept the defaults and the DDS chip will then start working.
You can take the sine wave off the middle leg of the potentiometer R6 or pin 3 of the AD811 socket (IC7).
1V pk-pk.
AD811 gives you a true sine wave (+ve and -ve) but we do not require this (I don't think)

@All,
Next step is to order some divide by 'n', counter and maybe a ripple counter ICs.
This allows you to have 3 harmonic frequencies of say 1-4-7 all in sync.
Plus you only need one master function generator. (Shame I bought 3.... dohhh!)

I found a divide by 'n' with dual BCD inputs so this can be connected to 2 of 10 ways rotary switch to give you a division of 2 to 99.
MC14569
http://www.farnell.com/datasheets/16766.pdf

Rob