Successful TPU-ECD replication !

[otto]

Hi Earl,

I used a mechanical balance. I was a few meters away from my TPU because I didnt want to influence in a way my equipment.

Otto

[gn0stik]

Hello all,

@Rich

sorry, Im weekends at my workbench and dont even look at the forum.

About the weight of a TPU:

A looong time ago I made a TPU, as we all did. 4 segments and the Tesla patent 390721 for a rotational magnetic field.

The weight of a 6" should be ...gramms (sorry, dont remember).
I measured the weight of my TPU. Then I got an idea:
To measure the weight of my TPU while pulsing it. And so I did it.
At a very low frequency of about 1 - 5 Hz I pulsed my TPU. In the same time I could clearly see that this TPU changes its weight.

So, its clear that the TPU pulsed in the needed frequency ranges should produce energy and in the same time its weight should and will decrease.

Otto

THANK YOU!! for the reply Otto!.

That is simply an amazing results. I will definitely try this with my ECD. If I can't do it with three control coils I will rewire with four controls per 390721. I think they do not actually lose weight (antigravity), but repel themselves from the earth's magnetic field. What are your thoughts on that?

I know you also said at one point that when you were working with the 390721 patents, that the rotation of field happened very easily as well. You also said, that using four controls is ok for ECD tests, as long as you wired according to that patent. But with three, if you wired it according to the ECD diagrams it would give the same result with only three controls.

When you measured the spinning field how did you do that? With a compass? For some reason Cam could not find it that way. I don't know if he did something wrong or not, but the compass would only point one way. Perhaps this should be done with 390721 too?

Also, how did you test the inertial effects? Just by feeling it with your hands? That's good enough for me, but it seems to dangerous to hold. Could I just bolt it down to a piece of plywood then? and feel it that way?

Again THANKS for the response, and proving people wrong about getting a response. I appreciate this alot! It will help me in my testing.

Also, I know you and roberto have made some progress, can you guys re-test these conditions? And report the results? See if they are still there? I really think these are indicators of the true conversion process happening in SM's device.

Regards,
Rich

[Grumpy]

Synchronize two watches - place one in center of ring - place one outside ring - run for several minutes.

[turbo]

now that is intresting, if we look at the Carl doc,

16.  It makes sense that if we are moving a relatively weak magnetic field at very high RPM or lap rate, then perhaps we are now also talking about a gravitic interaction.  Since it appears that gravity and spinning superconducting magnets are related, and we are spinning this field at a VERY high rate, then the orientation on startup is most likely also directly interacting with "gravitons?"  I won't go there, as I know too little about the field.  Suffice it to say, that gravity is directional, be it into the earth or into space from the earth's center.  Either way it is directional.  Inverting the toroid MAY then be affected in operation or stopped when it is inverted.  Has Steven Mark solved this?  It sounds SOOOOO interesting.  And naturally, with smaller toroids, he is also talking about higher angular acceleration of the field, due to the smaller diameter.  Maybe this also has a bearing on the trait?

one would asume the weight loss is due to the high speed rotational field, however Otto here is pulsing his coils at the verry low frequency of 0-5 Hertz.

Tonight i will stare out of the window for a couple of minutes to see if there are any Tesla transformers flying by.

Marco.

[gn0stik]

Tonight i will stare out of the window for a couple of minutes to see if there are any Tesla transformers flying by.

Marco.

Marco...

Read this...

http://www.ufoevidence.org/govtdocs/PageView.asp?DocCode=FBI2&page=4

this occured in 1947, the day before roswell, read what happened, then read the device description.

Then the inscription on the device. "Made in USA'

Regards,
Rich