Successful TPU-ECD replication !

[innovation_station]

guys marco has put his heart and soul in to this as many others have too people say things that hurt others but we must keep our wits about us here to progress further between all of us here we can do it publcly

and we will

let us not be hurt by others let us look to the bright light of sucucess 

i beleave what will happin from all of this confusion is this some one that has done it will come forward  and stand up and be the MAN

and they will

i know it

ist   

[turbo]

Hello all,

@Marco

how about to erase all my work here??? I have really no problem with this!!!

You look like a little dissapointed?? Frustrated???

Otto

Hi Otto, i'm not frustrated ,but dissapointed ,yes i guess.
On the first hand it seemed like we were close to finish with this thing, and then well you dissapeard....
i have to say i expected more then that.
it's understandable don't you think?

@13th hour, i am not talking about the scammer on e-bay ,i am talking about what this research already cost me..
it's quite a bit of money already.
so i decided to not spend too much on it until i get intresting results, that is understandable too don't you think?

M.

[13thHouR]

Getting back on topic:

Otto I have been looking further into what is occurring in these devices and have been able to find a direct association between the Kick and the Soliton waves.

If you read further back in the thread (prior to the scammer reports)

You can see these references http://jlnlabs.imars.com/spgen/ http://jnaudin.free.fr/html/sclxmtr.htm which a posted concerning (scalar/soliton waves)

After closer study, I have found as I suspected previously that a form of quantum tunnelling is occurring as the solitons waves merge.

This is very well known reaction, yet surprisingly there has only been very limited research in the field of study, most of which in recent history eminates from the work of Prof.Dr.G?nter Nimtz (Physics Institute at the University of Cologne).

Although much debate still remains concerning the definition of  transfer of information by non subluminal means, the physics community does however accept that he has succeeded in controlling quantum wave packets at non subluminal velocities (FTL).

The counter arguement basically consists of, "Does encoding Mozart 40 and transmitting this by smoothing of the wave packets amount to transfer of information by non subluminal means".

Obviously in current terms the physics community will not concede this as being information as they believe this would require them to re-write the laws of physics.

However our main concern here is the issue that is confirmed, you can transfer electrons via non subliminal means and specifically the merging of soliton waves in a coil create the same conditions as Prof.Dr.Gunter Nimtz's experiments.


Unlike Prof Nimtz we are not bound by the peer review process of the scientific community, so we can push the boundaries more on explanation without putting our entire careers on the line.

As an example we can use conjecture like my TDM or any other model that works, to extrapolate a more probable explanation.

In TDM terms the merging of the soliton waves causes a rapid increase in density (Classical Physics on its own describe this as the Quantum Wave Packet).  Such Particles/Waves in TDM terms propagate at subluminal velocities on a different scale range of the universe.  In scale (pseudo superluminal) velocity terms when compared to our scale range.

In the interim both the device and us are subject to the same compression, to a lesser degree of intensity (normal curvature of space time).

To put this in simpler terms.

A --------------------------- B

To travel from A to B we have to follow every step.

However in the case of these waves, they are compressing to a scale which is smaller than what we would deem as our Horizon (event horizon) on this scale.

They now interact with a scale of the universe which is too small when compared to us, for us to directly interact with them. In that universe scale (TDM state as I call them)

In doing so that scale of the universe has gained matter/energy. Thus it expands proportionately to the matter it has gained (like putting air into a balloon).

Because each scale universe can only be of a specific size, the lower density matter on the outer rim of that universe become the high density matter/energy of our scale.

Thus allowing for our shift in compression (path along the curvature of space time) as this process has occurred, our zero point has shifted to just below the range in which this displaced matter/energy can interact with us.

So we now observe the two soliton waves (electrons) again, with no loss of potential.

To be totally accurate, for there to be no loss of potential, the electrons have to be shifted in density proportionate to two scale universes down.

Why do we get such exponential increases of power at we introduce two or more harmonics?

This is a combination of phase timing to enhance the solitary waves  and the fact that 3 or more solitons start to merge, thus increasing the density shift proportionately and in turn accumulating the displacement force of 2 or more scale universes.

In microscopic terms each increase has been as the result of a mutilples of an estimated 10⁵⁴ Kg. So although on our scale the increases are say 120v to 800 Volt etc. On these scales we are talking about energy increases in the levels that exceed multiples of the sum of our finite universe.

It really puts things into perspective when we realise in General Relativities absolute terms what amount of energy is really  involved here.
 

[13thHouR]

Hello all,

@Marco

how about to erase all my work here??? I have really no problem with this!!!

You look like a little dissapointed?? Frustrated???

Otto

Hi Otto, i'm not frustrated ,but dissapointed ,yes i guess.
On the first hand it seemed like we were close to finish with this thing, and then well you dissapeard....
i have to say i expected more then that.
it's understandable don't you think?

@13th hour, i am not talking about the scammer on e-bay ,i am talking about what this research already cost me..
it's quite a bit of money already.
so i decided to not spend too much on it until i get intresting results, that is understandable too don't you think?

M.

Sorry about that, I should not have responded with such a knee jerk reaction. (I am always complaining about others doing that    )

It can be quite expensive at the research end of things. Much easier and cheaper for the guys that come afterwards when we have already done all that for them.

Personally I am into this to the tune of about ?4K (including new hardware that I needed to re-set up my lab). So I know all about the expenses. My credit card company loves me now 

I did get sponsorship to do this, but I decided to dip deeply into my own pocket to fund my part of the research, as commercial funding just goes against the whole basis of what we are doing here. (As well as existing patent issues)

However it does show that there are those of us out here willing to put in the time and where possible costs involved to push back the boundaries on research.

It is tough, and at times we will all feel like giving up, but we have the bug, be it few days or a few years, we just know we will be back doing this all over again. So don't lose faith in what we can do.

btw I was just child when I devised TDM, I know what it can do, I know its Physics Nobel Prize territory, but I had to wait over 25 years before science caught up enough so that I did not sound like Tesla, telling of the things to come. Now that is a lot of frustration.

As well as being in the process, of building a replica of the existing unit. To add to successful replicated devices.

1. working on a Caduceus coil (As these are natural solitary wave emmiters) and true mobius loop variation, but obviously it will take time the isolate best way of making that version work. (if at all)

2. testing a Rodin coil/QET target setup to see if spin and tunneling  can be increased without increasing source current.


A curious fact, in relation to commercial funding, many people are watching closely as to what we are doing, they approached me with funding, not visa versa, but as I mentioned previously I refused this (although it would have made things a lot easier to obtain) as it goes against the whole principle of what we are doing. Even if other decided to opt out form the research at this time. It is expensive and time consuming, I think I can speak on behalf of everybody here in this respect and thank them for the excellent work they have done so far.

However I do hope they continue and leave their documents here for others to follow. Because we if we do not succeed down this path on the higher power devices (in this variation), this may be just the spark of inspiration that somebody else needs.

[disclosure]

@Otto

Why is he forcing us to "reinvent the wheel" at great costs if the solution is a few mouse clicks(and a bit of bravery) away?