Stupid questions from crazy old man....

[IronHead]

beedees"
You got it. You just wont see good physical comedy like that any more .The  good  ol days . Laurel and Hardy


about TheOne
He aint wrong  , crazy but not wrong


And flaming ,sniping and such , well nothing really wrong with that . The warm rush that you feel up your back as it heats your brain , lets you know your alive . It's like that Roughtwiler  that jumps the fence and you know all he wants is your butt attached to his teeth. That poor puppy is just playing , showing you who is boss of the fence. Even if he does kill you, he did not mean to . He just does not understand how fragile people have become.




A head full of pure Iron , which gives me good focus
IronHead

[beedees]

...if I'm producing 14.6 volts and 65 amps. ( D. C.) and using 12 volts @30 amp. draw, is this considered overunity? I know very little about the specifics of power-useage vs. generating it. Thanks

Hi,

Yes, I think what you asked can be considered overunity. 
Your input 12V x 30A=360 Watts
Your output 14.6V x 65A=949 Watts

Please read here some thoughts on efficiency and COP (Coefficient of Performance) from Thomas Bearden:
http://www.cheniere.org/correspondence/022502.htm

So if your measurements are correct you have got a device with a COP of 2.63! This is fantastic achievement.  Could you tell me / us some more details on your device?

Regards
Gyula

Thanks for your reply. The example I used was based on a '70's vintage alternater. I know there are  ones
much more efficient now, but I like dealing with smaller numbers. This motor (using the term loosely) does work, the first and only one so far for a very short time.
   Now comes the buts and the ifs.
How does D.C. voltage convert to A.C. voltage---numbers wise?
I'll need the expertise of a computer expert- I need a system capable of switching on and off  up to 57,600 ( maybe more, probably less) times a minute in a varying preset sequence...is this even possible?
        Thanks
This thing is big...in this case the bigger the better.

[angryScientist]

How does D.C. voltage convert to A.C. voltage---numbers wise?
I'll need the expertise of a computer expert- I need a system capable of switching on and off  up to 57,600 ( maybe more, probably less) times a minute in a varying preset sequence...is this even possible?
        Thanks
This thing is big...in this case the bigger the better.

It's pretty simple for sine waves.

The way the science world measures the energy in an AC signal is to compute what is called the root mean square (RMS) average of the voltage. In simple terms, the RMS value of an electrical current is the number which represents the same energy that a DC current at that voltage would produce; it is in essence an average of the alternating current waveform.

All you need to do is take the peek voltage, say 170V, multiply it by .7071 and that gives you the RMS, in this case I get 120V.
.7071 is easy for me to remember because it is the sine of a 45 degree angle.

Here is another way to say it.

Electrical engineers state the voltage of an AC sine wave as the RMS (root-mean-square), a value equal to the peak value of the sine wave divided by the square root of two, which is approximately 1.414. If you know the RMS voltage, you can multiply it by the square root of two to calculate the peak voltage of the curve. If you were to power a light bulb from 120V(RMS) AC, you would get the same amount of light from the bulb as you would by powering it from 120V DC.

(.7071 is the inverse of 1.414. 1/.7071 = 1.414)

  BTW, anybody got any thoughts on the Hutchinson effect?

I have had an idea floating around in my head that might just describe the effect. I'll have to search around for an animation that I made to depict it.
In talking to John Hutchinson I am not entirely convinced that he knows what is going on with his experiments. Maybe he has listened to too many scientist, I don't think they know how things really work anyway.

[angryScientist]

Talking about RMS, most voltage meters today will not give you the peak voltage. They will give you a RMS voltage. If you measure the voltage of you wall outlet it will say 120V not 170V.

Any way here is my idea that MIGHT have some bearing on the Hutchinson effect.

The plates are electrified just as a capacitor. Electrons will be attracted to one plate and protons attracted to the other. As they move that tinny amount they move through a magnetic field. Since they are moving in opposite directions the magnetic deflection will be in the same direction for both charges.
Just to be punny I call this a 'flux capacitor'

I think that the same thing may be happening in Hutchinson's experiments with two electromagnetic waves at right angles to each other. They would have to have the same frequency and the proper phase. If they didn't have the correct phase then the effect would happen in a different area than the ideal 90 degree point.



EDIT:
Oh, here is the link to Hutchinson's web site and forum;
http://hutchisoneffectonline.com

[beedees]

What have you built old man? Tell use about your motor , might you have figured a way to control it ? Or is this something else all together?

A simple solenoid  of infinite travel, changing linear motion to rotating.