The Brnbrade Coil/Overunity?

[EMdevices]

Yes, you can say this is a PERPETUAL MOTION HOLDER.Ã, Ã, 

Magnetic fields generated by magnetisation of mater, makes use of the atomic spin or rotationÃ,  (perpetual motion on the atomic level)

Under the influence of an external magnetic field,Ã,  these tiny magnetic "moments", or little magnets,Ã,  align themselves with the external field, and the net macroscopic effect is an observed magnetic field that is even stronger.Ã, Ã,  (the atoms are always magnetic but the net effect can be zero when the external field is removed due to random orientation of the tiny magnetic moments)

So what keeps the magnetization "alive"Ã, Ã,  ?

I can see you guys are wondering, but it's realy simple.Ã,  Ã,  If you build up a magnetic field in an inductor, and then short the inductor leads,Ã, it will continue to persist.   This is because as the magnetization tries to decrease the coil reacts by Lenz's law to drive a current that opposes the change.Ã, Ã,  Hence the magnetization is preserved by the current that flows in the coil.

To make such a system as efficient as possible so it can last a long time, it is necessary to use a coil with very little resistance so it does not rapidly discharge the inductor.Ã,  So that's why it is better to use two coils, a multi turn one for the high voltage that might be required, and a small turn coil that will keep the magnetisation alive by flowing a rather higher current.

Here's a drawing I did to illustrate the basic operation of an inductor storage system.Ã, Ã,  Can you identify a practical problem with it?Ã,  Ã,  I can see one alreadyÃ, 

EM

@allcanadian, there are multiple current in his invention absolutely.

[BEP]

Yes.

Single coils on each core, even with low resistance and shorted, the flux will still collapse in short order.

This is why the second coil on each core is needed. As the flux falls it crosses the turns of the inner coil (high turn count) which are connected to bolster the flux in the outer coil of the other core.

If you use multiple rods or iron wires for the core you increase this activity and add vibration which causes more flux change. If you break the circuit completely this cycle is stopped and the flux falls to a damped oscillation.

[allcanadian]

I just made a post in tesla technology/patent 512340 that seems very relevant to this, that is how the device could maintain operation and produce excess energy in the right context if multiple coils were used. Just a thought

[EMdevices]

I'll go read what you posted there allcanadian

BEP,  the trick to getting the flux not to collapse fast is in the resistance of the wires. 

I can't find the web link, but some guy already demonstrated this.  He could close the switch and open a few days later and it would still have the flux ready to do work.

Anyway, this is what struck me as the mechanism for this invention.  However, it could be something more interesting than we imagine.  However, he does say that it's not galvanic.  And because he seems to explain how it works based on currents, it leads me to believe its the super inductor concept.

I'll go read his patent once more, maybe something new will jump out at me.

EM

[BEP]

Are you thinking of Matthew Emery?

I have the impression you are thinking more in terms of what old power plant folk (meaning me) call circulating currents. They were a bugger in multi-generator systems but used no noticable energy from the generator. (Not to be confused with cross-currents for those thinking they are power plant folk

I think the trick is to not allow the flux to fall at all. Supposedly this is expected to be possible in parallel resonant circuits but the conductors would have to be superconductors or, at least, zero ohms. All impedance would be approaching infinity.
But then I'm talking about voltage varying over time.