Open Letter to Steorn

[aiks]

However, Steorn's Orbo whether scam or not, did at least one good thing.
It turned heads of at least couple of persons towards "free" energy concepts.
Speaking for myself: it was Steorn's forum which brought me to overunity.com; and I have been active reader ever since. As soon as my current business startup starts to perform on it's own (goes into perpetual mode?) I will most liekely share some of the free time in participation of building and testing some of the units.

Appart from what I said, I must give thumbs up and big thanks to Stefan; you are doing one hell of a job at keeping such active comunity here.

[gaby de wilde]

I would like to see everyone posting here back up their silly claims. If you want to claim there are no free energy devices in the universe. Then you have to provide evidence of such. If you want to anonymously post on the Internet that you claim someone is a scam. Then you should deliver the evidence Mr. anonymous or you are the con artist yourself.

Meanwhile you are just a bunch of Vatican Wikipedia editors IMHO.

I visit this topic to read Lawrence posts, I'm not at all interested in reading your quick spew, menstrual moods and conspiracy theories. What made you think that stuff is interesting?

I think anonymous has oil stocks and lots of em! I don't have to prove my claim, you can disprove it for me. By your own logic everyone should be guilty until proven innocent.

So there you have it.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R7kKTDvFQ7M

[Humbugger]

Now Gaby, calm down! 

"If you want to claim there are no free energy devices in the universe. Then you have to provide evidence of such."

Do you see that you are asking for proof of a negative here?  An impossible task? 

Proof that something does not exist by someone who does not claim to have it is a lot different than proof that something does exist by someone who claims to have it!

The skeptic does not and cannot, even if he wished to, bear the burden of proving a negative.  It is the duty of those who claim to have done the impossible to provide, if not proof, some reasonable evidence at least!

I'm a free energy skeptic and I don't work for the Vatican or the CIA or anyone else.  You really are acting silly with these "burden of proof on the doubter" and "debunking conspiracy" rants.  Remember that the vast majority of scientists, physicists and engineers still believe in the laws of thermodynamics! 

Remember to have fun and to laugh at yourself now and then!   

Humbugger

[Omnibus]

@Humbugger,

The skeptic does not and cannot, even if he wished to, bear the burden of proving a negative.  It is the duty of those who claim to have done the impossible to provide, if not proof, some reasonable evidence at least!

I have done that. I have proven beyond a shadow of a doubt that CoE can be violated. Why don't you then just shut up and discontinue your useless rant?

[Omnibus]

I'm a free energy skeptic

You, a skeptic? That's quite an overstatement. Incompetents such as you are not called skeptics, they are just incompetents.