Spinor resonance -- explanation for TPU like devices

[tao]

@Mark

It was great to see you mention the open ended primaries. I have been trying to convey exactly this concept to one of the replicators that had it in his head that more primary current was the answer. When I told him that the primaries (control coils) could even be fed open-ended with potential, he seemed to think I was nuts! I had to explain to him that in order to do this, the power FET driving the open ended coils would have to be loaded in order to be able to dissipate the pulse potential as quickly as possible. This is the reason I just complete the DC path through the primaries, as it can be so much easier to do, as long as the drive pulses can be kept short enough to switch off before much primary current can begin to flow.

You are 100% correct in that the higher the DC bias potential, the greater the energy gain possible. The only reason I limit to the 160 VDC region in that common unit is because it is the voltage requirement of the load that unit was designed to power. By the way, I had that same replicator run a test by installing a DC blocking capacitor in series with a 120 volt load, raise the DC bias potential, and watch the output climb while no additional load was placed on the power supply. I think he finally may have learned something about the potential of DC potential ;-)

Have you tried spinor resonance modelling with the use of x, 2x, 4x phase controlled drive frequencies. I am curious about what it would predict?

Bob Boyce

Hi Bob, Mark,

Got a question for you gentlemen...

Based on your theories/ideas/devices and your talk of having a DC bias so as to encourage the energy gain, what do you make of the statements below given by Steven Mark? Do you think Steven's use of the word 'circuit potential' is akin to your 'DC bias potential' ?


Here are some quotes from Steven Mark:

"However, you had to find a circuit potential in order for the electrons to flow."

"If you know how to find the circuit potential, you tune into the frequency and you have enough short pieces of wire you can convert as much power as you wish in a given space."


I might add, and of course you surely already know, in the open TPU we can clearly see open ends on the red windings...

[Super God]

Wow, I'm so ready to build something, argh, no switching device yet, I'm still thinking of that.  But Mr.Mag GENEROUSLY let me have his oscilloscope for shipping charges, no a bad deal at all.  So once that arrives I'll start my experiementing.  My coils are all wound and ready to generate some power!  Heh.

[Motorcoach1]

@ Dr Snoswell:  I know this is a little off subject: I'm in need of some CAD help and seams that you are good at this. I have designed an engine that runs on hydroxy as what Bob boyce is working on his hydrogen unit. I have built a model and have the specs. on the part. I would like to publish the engine on here and give it to anyone that wants to build it and sell it as they see fit. It is rather simple and works well. I'll list all parts and where to get them so as there will be no hidden things to guess at -and improvements are appriciated. I feel this  and some assembleis are patenable but I'm not going through that again. If you could supply a Cad file that could be sent to a machine shop to make the part,  that would be great or if anyone else could help that would be appriciated too.  I'm sure after I post the assemblies and parts list there will be a lot of folks that will really like it and make a little profit for themselfs in the process. Thank you mike  ,,,  It is a one stroke engine more later -----:)

[Earl]

Hi All,

I would like to have a generic model for a TPU, so I drew up an image with 4 excitation coils.  Since the first Ford horseless carriage was the model T, this is what I call it.  The current in the collector coil is I.

I observe the following points:

a) talking about A sine wt or -A sin wt or cos 2wt, e.g. mixing frequencies and harmonics only makes sense when talking about analog excitation.

b) when using pulses, preferentially say between 1 ps to 500 ns, we can only talk about pulse width and repetition rate.  We can not talk about frequency, nor harmonics.

c) when talking about two pulse sequences, we can only talk about time offset, unless n coils fire immediately one after the next - then we could talk about phase.

d) the [copper] collector coil of m turns, here shown m=1, has a pulsating DC current.  The collector current pulsates less as the number of coils n tends towards infinity.  Most likely the high-voltage spikes will be caused by removal of voltage across a coil.  The removal causes a polarity reversal across the coil.  The short, low voltage electrostatic charge across the coil causes a reverse current flow in the collector coil.  This is the reason for the little spikes in the collector current.

As the number of excitation coils, n, approaches infinity the current becomes more uniform and flat.

e) the collector coil is shown short-circuited between A and B.  A magnetically-coupled coil in the same plane as the collector would only be able to extract the ripple and therefore most likely NOT an interesting way to tap output power.  Likewise with capacitive output coupling.

f) If the collector current sees a resistive load between A and B, a DC voltage I*R will be produced. This voltage will also have the above-mentioned hash superimposed upon it.

ms > When working with high frequencies it's pretty easy to inductively or capacitivly decouple the output coil (collector) from the load.

In the generic case, the collector mostly has DC current flowing in it and therefore inductive or capacitive ouput coupling is either not feasible or too inefficient.

The most efficient way appears to me to low-pass filter the collector output, then use a DC/DC or DC/AC convertor of conventional design.

g) Notice that all n coils, in this case n=4, all driven from floating, independent batteries.  No circuitry nor batteries are grounded, whatever ground means.  Ground, in any case, only exists for DC.  In AC circuits, ground becomes more and more undefined as frequency increases or pulse width decreases.

h) I would like the group to get away from sloppy use of words and terms, e.g. DC bias, which means nothing.  This is no different from amateur radio operators who lazily say "I am going to turn on my linear".  What they mean to say is linear amplifier.  DC bias can be voltage with no current, it can be voltage with current, it can be current.

May I suggest the following:

DC ELECTROSTATIC BIAS means
voltage biased with no current drawn

DC BIAS means the voltage across the windings's resistance causes a current to flow.

DC CURRENT BIAS means we are not concerned about the winding voltage, but mostly by the current, for example in a YIG-oscillator coil.

Let's define a standard terminology and rigorously stick to it.

i) I have shown coil terminals C and D.  Connecting a voltage between them will cause a current to flow depending upon the coil's resistance.

If using only one coil lead and letting the other hang in the air, one needs a second reference point for the power supply.  The generic TPU model T is perfectly balanced and symmetrical and has no ground anywhere.

Therefore a DC electrostatic bias is not possible.

j)  The TPU will only deliver excess power output if there is UPA (unknown power amplification).
This UPA is still elusive and its existance is in doubt.  The scientific method says a device does not exist unless it can be replicated by peers.  After the student jokes of Brnbrade and EMdevices, we must insist on rigorously holding to the scientific method.  Until there are one or more valid replications, the TPU remains a rumor, a fraud, a dream, a deception, you pick your term.
Our knowledge should now be at a point, where careful, non-sloppy building could produce the desired successful replication.

I am now at the point where I think coil winding is not good enough.  The coils must be precision "hand-crafted" for each turn, just like a Swiss watch maker.  Perfectly uniform, each an identical twin of the others.

Regards, Earl

[BEP]

@Earl

Do you see a way to use a static bias from permanent magnets? Perhaps it would be called magnetostatic?
Since magnetic fields are a big player here could it be used to 'bias' the magnetic field and create an effect similar to what many think is needed?