The Lee-Tseung Lead Out Theory

[Cap-Z-ro]

@ Koen

If I wanted, I too could duplicate Mr. Tsung's writing style...it really isn't all that difficult.

The similarities have not escaped me either..but I've learned not to jump to the obvious conclusion...especially on a public message board.

There are no shortages of meddlesome people who get off\f on creating turmoil everywhere they go...and are very creative in their efforts.

So unless there is a real urgent need to make a decision, I wait as long as I can before committing myself to any course of action.

Regards...

[Koen1]

well, I think you're missing the point but hey...

It is not a matter of people duplicating his style.
And it is not "jumping to the obvious conclusion" either.
It's a matter of him posting under different names to
try and add validity to his arguments.
After following this thread as long as I have, it is indeed
obvious, but certainly not "jumping to conclusions".
Excessively transparent is probably a better term.

But like I said, it doesn't really matter...
Although one can wonder why he feels the need to
attempt to add validity to his arguments, if he were
sincere and truly certain of his case, and why he
does it in such a transparent way.
Probably for the same reason why he still hasn't managed
to present a plausible OU device in a clear and
coherent manner even though he's posted huge loads
of text: he just doesn't get it.

And by the way, the only reason why I keep bugging him
about it is because he keeps bragging about his grandiose
ideas but to this day has not been able to produce any
proof, of any form, of his OU claims.
As long as he keeps that up, and keeps blowing his own horn
while intentionally ignoring valid questions and remarks by
others, obviously his credibility will keep dropping. And it has
already dropped to aluminium-foil-hats level...

[ltseung888]

Now, we are ready to re-discuss Slide 12.

Translation of presentation slide 12.

Tseung: "Once we have the forces, we can find out the work done by these forces.  Work = Force x Displacement.?

Refer to the diagram.  Assume the Length of the Pendulum is L.

Tseung: ?The horizontal displacement is dX.  The value is Lsin(a) or Lsin(9.46).  The vertical displacement is dH. The value is L-Y or L(1-cos(9.46))?

Tseung: ?Since we know the displacements, we can calculate the work done in the horizontal and in the vertical directions.  The horizontal work done = F x Lsin(9.46).  The vertical work done = Mg x L(1-cos(9.46)).  We can use the value of F = 10 and Mg = 60 in our calculation.  Work done = Energy spent in Physics.  Thus the (horizontal energy / vertical energy) can be calculated to be 2.014.  The value of L is cancelled out and thus no assumed value is needed.?

Pause.

Tseung: ?The ratio of 2.014 is extremely significant.  It means 2.014 parts of horizontal energy can Lead Out 1 unit of vertical energy.  The horizontal energy is supplied by my pull.  The vertical energy is supplied by the tension of the string which is effectively the energy from gravity.  I spend approximately 2 units of energy.  Gravity supplies 1 unit of energy.  These 3 units of energy goes into the pulled pendulum system.?

Lee: ?This is a simplified analysis for the average scientist.  We also have a more exact version using Integrals for discussion with Physicists or Mathematicians who want to dig really deep.?

The spreadsheet for the more exact ideal Lee-Tseung pull is also available for those who are interested.

Mathematically, the horizontal displacement (dX) is
(1)   Lsin(a) = Lsin(9.46)  This is trigonometry and cannot be wrong.

The vertical displacement (dH) is
(2)   L-Y = L(1-cos(9.46))  This is trigonometry and cannot be wrong.

Thus the work done horizontally is
(3)   horizontal force x horizontal displacement
   F x Lsin(9.46) = 10 x Lsin(9.46) = 1.6436L (Energy Units) 
   This is simple multiplication involving trigonometry and cannot be wrong.
   Note that there is an L (pendulum string length) term here.

The work done vertically is
(4)   vertical force x vertical displacement
Mg x L(1-cos(9.46)) = 60 x L(1-0.9864) = 60 x L(0.0136)
= 0.816L (Energy Units)
   This is simple multiplication involving trigonometry and cannot be wrong.
   Note that there is an L (pendulum string length) term here.

We can now calculate the ratio of the horizontal work over vertical work
(5)   1.6436L / 0.816L = 1.6436 / 0.816 = 2.014
   Note that the Length L cancels out and the ratio has no units.
  This is simple mathematical division and cannot be wrong.

We can equate work done as energy, thus horizontal energy supplied by F / vertical energy supplied by Mg is also 2.014.
(6)   Thus 2.014 units of horizontal energy supplied by Lee-Tseung pull F Leads Out 1 unit of vertical energy supplied by gravity in this example.

Every mathematical and physics step is correct.  Thus the Lee-Tseung pull (at least the first Lee-Tseung Pull) in this example Leading Out gravitational energy cannot be wrong.

Now I invite intelligent comments on the above analysis.  Can Slide 12 be wrong if every step is 100% correct?

[shruggedatlas]

Now I invite intelligent comments on the above analysis.  Can Slide 12 be wrong if every step is 100% correct?

I may look at the equations later, but what strikes me immediately is the following.

So what if you have done twice as much horizontal work than vertical work?  How does that create an overunity (or "lead out") situation where there is suddenly more energy out than in?  If I push a ball up a gentle incline, I will do more horizontal work than vertical work, but so what?

Also, based on your "lead out" principle, why does any pendulum ever stop moving?  After all, as it passes the low point, it still has enough kinetic energy to do work, namely lift the ball up the other side.

[Top Gun]

I would like to add the following:

(1)   Human Beings have managed to use gravitational energy for sometime.

(2)   One example is the dam storing water and driving turbines to generate electricity.

(3)   However, once the water flows down, it will need the Sun to evaporate it to become rain and be stored in the dam again.

(4)   That cycle is very long and involves many other external variables such as some water never returns to the dam and some new water flows into the dam.

(5)   The Lee-Tseung Pull on the Pendulum is extremely simple.  One spends 2 units of horizontal Lee-Tseung Pull energy and 1 unit of vertical gravitational energy is Lead Out.  The system now has 3 units as output.  If 2 of these 3 output units were used to provide Lee-Tseung Pull energy, another 1 unit of gravitational energy will be Lead Out again.

The pre-qualified scientists at Tsingjua and Shenzhen University Seminars would have no problem with Slides 10-12.  The significance of these Slides can be compared with E=M x c x c (The Einstein equation).  The energy crisis of the World is effectively over.  Human Beings can indeed use gravitational energy directly via the pulsed pendulum. 

The Milkovic Pendulum is not a hoax.  It is a confirmation of the Lee-Tseung Theory.