The Lee-Tseung Lead Out Theory

[ltseung888]

Maybe what would be helpful is to use actual numbers, instead of units.  So, if you want to convince us "laymen", please show an analysis that has the following:

1.  Mass of bob, in kilograms.
2.  Length of string, in meters or centimeters
3.  Horizontal force applied, in Newtons
4.  Distance the bob moves vertically and horizontally, in meters or centimeters

I think with the above, even we, the untrained, can figure out how much work is done and indeed whether two parts input results in three parts output.

Dear shruggedatlas,

In Mathematics and Physics, the best way to understand is to do some mathematics examples.  Please try to work out the answer for the following situation.

1.   Mass of bob is 80 kg
2.   Length of string is 0.5 meters
3.   Horizontal force is 1/8 of the force due to weight

Please work out
1.   The displaced angle a
2.   The horizontal displacement dX
3.   The vertical displacement dH
4.   The horizontal work done (horizontal energy)
5.   The vertical work done (vertical energy)
6.   The Input energy
7.   The total Output energy
8.   The COP during this process (Total Output Energy / Input Energy)

Any forum member can do the same calculation.  Mathematics cannot lie.  You should all get the same answer.  Let us have fun.

[Pirate88179]

I have the answer to number 7 already...I did it in my head.  It is 0.

Bill

[Koen1]

The Lee-Tseung theory uses the example of applying Lee-Tseung Pulls or Pulses on a simple pendulum to Lead Out gravitational energy.  Energy is Lead Out during the application of such Lee-Tseung Pulls.

Damn you, that is not an answer!
I ask "what mechanism is there to extract this alleged OU energy"
and you say "it's the Lee-Tseung pull."

okay, let me repeat my question then:
What is this mechanism that extracts the energy, this mechanism that you also call the "Lee-Tseung Pull"?

All other comments will be deferred.

you mean "ignored", don't you?

okay, well, my reply then:

Please answer only the questions asked. I will not be impressed with you constantly repeating meaningless expressions.
I will not be impressed with your self-centered behaviour. Any such posts will be "deferred".

[Tribune]

Hello.

Only today did i learn about Over Unity and this Thread is intrique'ing and far to complex for my limited attention span. but.

I for some reason feel the need to air my observations/speculation/Random thoughts. Feel free to ignore the rest now.

I always found it curious how a magnet could defy gravity supporting its own mass against gravity indefinately?.

After reading today about newman and the motors/generators. it all seems very intearesting; So as im just a simple/logical person id like to check a few things with the more knowledgable in here if your not bored already.

So not knowing much about electrostatic/Gravitational forces; They behave like a fluid yes?

its like a rain that permeates everything dragging it down. and these tests are here to show how this force can be re-directed and its energy used to move something or produce energy.

like spinning an unberella in the rain; as the water is expeled it moves out horizontally until it hits something passing its force to the object?..(i guess that is how Gyroscope works).

Using that Gyroscope method of re-directing (Gravity?). can those forces be applied to the concept of the pendulum to increase the energy hitting it?.

ok; so im distracted. but if gravity?. behaves like a fluid then the generators that seem to use this force from spinning could be like'end to a propellar expelling air to give a desired result.

That opens all sorts of questions as how EM shielding could be applied to the propellar to direct the flow away from the horizontal; into a nice loop. feeding itself giving rise to more Torque for a heavyer load.

I know i prolly missed out so many steps above. i just focus on specific items. assuming ppl fill in the blanks.

Sorry for the disjointed/random questions; thats it for today. il think about it more. Beer is bad (Especiallay for spelling)

Having thought about it more. as there is less gravity in space. Gravity must be a result of a spinning mass attracting something. and the Gyroscope spinning faster re-directing the force?.

So logically the fluid properties are not entirely true... Imagine a stick on that still lake. and you spin an object in the water. the stick is drawn into the object spinning. that object has its own force that will be appled to the spinning object. but the stick is not a fluid(it just behaves like the fluid around it). is that like Gravity?

And as the objects dragged in could be any/many items combined together. wow. so many questions..

Another Edit :..

So if a spinning mass all charged up like the earth is. attracts these cosmic? things.. wow so mad questions now. that would be like northern lights n sht. and could we direct these items if we placed a spinning object outside the Earth.

If we put a Satelite pwered by this technology in orbit. would the attraction of the cosmic stuff decay its orbit before the energy was extracted. like the rain hitting the unbrella exerts a force.

if we used this energy on mass on earth. would the suction mess with the order of things.. sht its like a Black Hole. lol;

Does that Explain the Black hole. is it a natural/mess Overunity machine eating all this cosmic stuff. and the worlds are the Stick on the lake.. Chukkle;

if everything has an equal and opposite. then does a black hole feed a sun on the other side..

Yes to many questions and not enough input.

Would a overunity device be-less efficient on the moon as it attracts less of this sht; as it hass less mass than the earth.. So mad .

ok im stop drinking now and chill. i hope some of you more focused brains can enlighten me more.

Be Gentle with me. lol; i really do want to understand more.

Trib.

[ltseung888]

Hello.

Only today did i learn about Over Unity and this Thread is intrique'ing and far to complex for my limited attention span. but.

I for some reason feel the need to air my observations/speculation/Random thoughts. Feel free to ignore the rest now.

I always found it curious how a magnet could defy gravity supporting its own mass against gravity indefinitely?.

After reading today about Newman and the motors/generators. it all seems very interesting; So as im just a simple/logical person id like to check a few things with the more knowledgeable in here if your not bored already.
....
Be Gentle with me. lol; i really do want to understand more.

Trib.

Dear Tribune,

I know that there is much reading.  The minimum you need to read is from reply 1822 in this thread.  That is the start of the discussion focusing on only 3 slides.

Ignore the irrelevant posts.  There is much noise but that is the drawback of an open forum.  Proper understanding of those 3 slides will help you under the physics behind extracting or leading out energy from gravity or electron motion.