The Lee-Tseung Lead Out Theory

[Top Gun]

I would like to add the following points:

(1)   A horizontal force cannot do vertical work unless some machine type arrangement is used to convert its direction (e.g. pulley)

(2)   In the case of the simple pendulum pulled to one side, we see no machine type arrangements.

(3)   However, we see the tension in the string doing work.  Thus we must examine this work done by this tension.  We all know that the tension of the string is partly due to gravity and partly due to the horizontal pull. 

(4)   Gravity must play a part in the pulled pendulum system.

(5)   This is the brilliance of the Lee-Tseung theory.  After the first Lee-Tseung Pull, we just let the pendulum go.  The pendulum will swing to the opposite side and back.  During the swing, no additional energy goes into the pendulum system.  When the pendulum swings back to the let-go position, we can apply another Lee-Tseung Pull.  That Pull will again Lead Out gravitational energy.

(6)   The freely swinging pendulum is NOT an OU device.  The Lee-Tseung Pulled pendulum is an OU device during the application of the Lee-Tseung Pull.  Gravitational energy is Lead Out during the Pull.  This is the ?corrected theory of the pendulum? as stated in the ABSTRACT of the PCT patent application.

[chrisC]

As much as I do not wish to make this report...it appears the head of Mr.Tsung has been photo shopped on to the body of another speaker at the conference.

If you look closely at the photo you will notice that whoever did the job inadvertently left the head that was once where Lawrence's is now situated in the frame in amongst the flower arrangement over to the left of Lawrence's head.

*Always clean up once you complete your task, and a similar faux pas will not occur to you.

Regards...

Good observation Cap-Z-ro! Now, do you work for the CIA and are you also paid?

Here's a enlarged photo of Tseung. Yes, you can see, the edges are not the same as what a real photo would have been. Particularly, notice the areas above the mic.

Now, is Tseung real? Are those 'energy' conferences real? Is the patent material just a piece of junk?
Is Forever a real girl? Now, I am being labeled a liar for coming back in order to expose the real Tseung!

Maybe, it's all looping in our heads.

cheers
chrisC

ps: I tried enlarging the image but the Forum only allowed 50kb image size. You will need to look at the picture using Fax/Viewer or any Photo software and you will see what Cap-Z-ro meant!

So, what is the real story Mr. Tseung? Are you trying to be someone you're not?

[SeanTheLight]

I have responses from 2 university students. 1 is skeptical but says it "looks right". The other says that there is an error in the usage of both horizontal and vertical displacement in the calculation.

I say....Distance travelled should be calculated as a circle, since the string is acting as a rigid body when T >= mG. That does not mean the theory is incorrect, in my opinion, just that the explanation is questionable. If you imagine a pendulum as an upside down lever, the fulcrum is the opposition to force (Mechanical force > mG). The ability of the string to lift the bob, by a force acting at 90 degrees to direction of travel (vertical), is caused by increasing T to > mG. Reaction of string is to pull with force = to (T - mG). This causes vertical displacement since the strings force vector is vertical.

If the pendulum was hanging motionless, and T was suddenly caused to exceed mG, the bob would "bounce" vertically as the system reaches equilibrium again. Pulling horizontally on a pendulum still causes T to exceed mG since the length of string does not change, but the horizontal force causes the bob to travel beyond the length of string. Instead of physically moving past where it is possible to, it loads some of that force into string, causing T to increase. T attempts to reach equilibrium by applying equal force to the mounting point (immovable) and the bob (movable) so net result of that balance, is lifting the bob.

Can you show the same calculations using vector arithmetic and still show a net gain in energy when measuring the bob at balance, during a horizontal force?

The idea that the string holds no energy and does no work is laughable. Stopping the bob from dropping is requiring a constant (mG) amount of force to be applied, resisting the force pulling the bob down further. An equal amount of force is also being applied on the mounting point side of string, stopping the string from being pulled down by the bob. Since we hold 2 things together via mechanical force and say that no work is being done, we are doomed to view things that way.

The string lifting the bob is work. yes? Horizontal force was used to load the system up with energy, but the result of that force on its own accord, would only have moved the bob horizontally. The energy transfer systems at play within the pendulum allowed some horizontal force to be converted into vertical force.

And to answer an obvious question, if a pendulum is 150% efficient, why do they stop swinging. The answer is when pendulum reaches balance at top of its swing, the moment where it hangs allows T to be < mG, since force in a string only acts 1 direction (there is T but no compression) the excess is lost to oscillation/slack in the string.

Remember, I'm a layman, and I am still learning trigonometry. If i am wrong, be gentle. 

[ltseung888]

As much as I do not wish to make this report...it appears the head of Mr.Tsung has been photo shopped on to the body of another speaker at the conference.

If you look closely at the photo you will notice that whoever did the job inadvertently left the head that was once where Lawrence's is now situated in the frame in amongst the flower arrangement over to the left of Lawrence's head.

*Always clean up once you complete your task, and a similar faux pas will not occur to you.

Regards...

That head belongs to Mr. T.S. Cheung張天松.  He was acting as the translator from Cantonese to Putonhua. (The local Chinese dialect spoken commonly in Hong Kong to the Official Chinese Language.)

To show that he is real, shown belong is a group photo taken at the dry run.  The place is the conference room with the Beijing Aeronautical University banner in Shenzhen.  The five persons are張天松., Tseung, Lee Cheung Kin, Prof. Hsu許立æâ€"¹æ•â,,¢Ã¦Å½Ë† and Mr. Lui劉å¿â€"軍.  Mr. Lui is the chief coordinator for the New Company in Shenzhen.  You will see and hear much more about him shortly.  He is arranging a number of road shows throughout China to discuss the New Energy amongst academics. His Company will also set up the website in Chinese for the New Company.

張天松, 許立æâ€"¹ and 劉å¿â€"軍 are all graduates of the Beijing Aeronautical University,  They all mastered the Lee-Tseung theory thoroughly.  There are already 6 trained experts whom I feel confident that can use our slides to present to any audience.  The other three are Ms. Forever Yuen, Lee Cheung Kin and myself.

[ltseung888]

I have responses from 2 university students. 1 is skeptical but says it "looks right". The other says that there is an error in the usage of both horizontal and vertical displacement in the calculation.

Dear SeanTheLight,

Thank you for your efforts.  I am interested in more detailed comments from your two university student friends.  The reaction of the first one is to be expected.  He needed time to digest the information more.  The implications of the Slides are too important.

The Second Student might have looked at the movement of the string instead of the bob.  However, before I further comment, I would like to respectfully seek his written comments.

Thank you in advance for your more efforts again.  I can see that you are using layman language to explain Physics.  It will greatly help your understanding if you show your written material to your university student friends and buy them a beer.  They might be more than happy to make things clearer to you.