The Lee-Tseung Lead Out Theory

[ltseung888]

Mr Tseung:

To set the record straight, I never said I knew the Professor personally anywhere on this Forum.

The email has been edited and sent.  We now wait for his reply.  Meanwhile, I shall get some of the academics in Hong Kong and Shenzhen who already understood the seminar material to comment on Slides 10-12.

I shall appreciate more civilized behavior from Forum Members.  I do not mind abusive insults.  But not all academics can take that.

[ltseung888]

While we are waiting for the response from Prof. Jian Lu of Hong Kong Polytechnical University as suggested by chrisC, I have asked one of the participants in the Shenzhen University Forum to see if he is willing to talk to the forum members.

He is Mr. Peter Chan.  He happens to be a graduate of the Hong Kong Polytechnical University.  He is the owner of an Engineering Company (滿江紅) and has done a number of projects related to energy including oil factory in Inner Mongolia and the water pump invention from Taiwan etc.  He can speak fluent English, Cantonese and Putonhua.  He is helping Dr. James Wong to set up a non-profit energy institute to provide consultancy on Energy Issues in Hong Kong.  He has seen the presentation and the technical spreadsheets multiple times .

His contact information is very easy to remember.
Name = Peter Chan
email = pc61822276@yahoo.com.hk 
Phone: (852) 6182 2276. 

Direct phone calls will confirm his existence and that he is not another Tseung personality.

He was also the one who introduced Tseung to the Beijing Aeronautical University in 2003.  He worked with Mr. Sun and produced the many videos under ?simulating the Minota wheel? on youtube.

[Pirate88179]

@ Lawrence:

Is he related to Charlie?  (Just kidding)

This is good actually.  I would love to hear (read) other outside views of your theory.  I do agree that some of us might have been a little overzealous in our objections to your posts.  I think that most here agree that you are a nice, decent guy, and I believe that as well.  Your theory is so outlandish that either, it is an order of magnitude step ahead in physics understanding, or, you are misinformed.  I am still trying to keep an open mind here.  If you told me 1+1=3, I might laugh and joke about your idea.  But, if it turned out that 1+1=3, then I would be humbled by your advanced thinking and creativity.

We all take some abuse here on a public forum and I have received, and given my share.  As I said, I like you and respect your efforts...I am still not at the point where I agree with you.

Bill

[Koen1]

Well, to me it seems very strange that Tseung first claimed to
have a theory that was definately the holy grail of OU, according to those
same claims, and that he already had a patent in China, and that
power generators based on his theory were either already being produced
or production was imminent,

and now all of a sudden it turns out he even needs Chris's assistance
to find the email addres of a proper professor in hong kong...

So he has apparently never really had any physics professor or
qualified physics graduate take a close look at his "theory"?

That is odd, as I seem to recall from a few hundred posts back,
that Tseung did claim he had backing from some professors...

Slowly but surely the truth is coming out:
- Tseung has a residential address in California USA, not Hong Kong or China
- Tseung's patent application was denied on the basis of the concept
being in conflict with the laws of physics, and on the basis of him being
unable to explain why it would work in physics terms with any degree of clarity
- Tseung has not had a proper phyiscs graduate or professor even study his
claimed "theory" and cannot even find an email address of such a professor
in the same city where he claims to live (even though according to his patent
application he does not live in Hong Kong but in California)
- Tseung has, in the past, claimed he cannot provide any proof or do any
empirical tests for invalid reasons, with arguments like "I cannot use a drill";
totally invalid of course, and still no reason to just skip the empirical testing
phase

...
I wonder how much they pay at the NSA for this guy to pretend to be
a crazy chinaman and spew disinformation into the over unity society,
thus distracting people from spending their time studying real
over unity ideas and designs that do have a clear theoretic basis,
which can be explained and understood and on which empirical tests
are actually being run,
instead of this constant babble with zero empirical tests, zero proper
clear theoretical basis, and only the very insistant ranting of a chinaman
to keep it going. Ok, that ranting chinaman does show an uncanny similarity
to the Duracell bunny, he keeps going and going and going and going
But much like the Duracell bunny, he does not say much that makes any
sense, and his repetitive tightly clenched moves which he keeps repeating
over and over again do tend to get quite annoying...

[utilitarian]

Well, to me it seems very strange that Tseung first claimed to
have a theory that was definately the holy grail of OU, according to those
same claims, and that he already had a patent in China, and that
power generators based on his theory were either already being produced
or production was imminent

Actually, I think the six months of the "validation period by the Chinese government" have already passed since Tseung mentioned it in this thread, so we should be seeing Wang Hum Sho's machine anytime now!  And Tseung said we would see something "in 2008 for sure", so I think when this year passes, we will know the truth.

On another note, "chinaman" is considered a little offensive these days, as this is a term used to describe the stereotypical Chinese man with a Fu Man Chu mustache, and is a hark back to the railroad-building days.  So we should probably not use that word.  Also, it is conceivable that Tseung moved back to Hong Kong since the patent application date of 2006.