The Lee-Tseung Lead Out Theory

[chrisC]

联系人： 王沈河      秘书长
Contact Person: Wang Shum Ho  - Secretariat
详细åÅ"°åâ,¬Ã¯Â¼Å¡ 中国?辽宁çÅ"?沈阳市 
Address: Shum Yang City, Li Ling Province, China
电话： 86-24-24186088    手æÅ"ºï¼š 13066636868
Phone: 86-24-24186088  Mobile: 13066636868
ä¼ çÅ"Ÿï¼š 86-24-24186088
Fax: 86-24-24186088
网åâ,¬Ã¯Â¼Å¡ http://
Website: not available


You can call him directly.  He has secretaries who can speak English.

Hahaha! No website and now the secretaries are going to explain how the Wang Generator works?
Nice one Tseung! Very original.

cheers
chrisC

ps: A little diversion and gives you time to think how you can un-muddle yourself and try to find a 'logical' explanation to Utilitarian & Kul-Ash questions. eh? You are so screwed up!

[ltseung888]

I am glad that Top Gun is answering all the technical questions.

Patience is not one of my virtues.  Teaching on the Internet is a skill I never acquired.

I am enjoying the show like many of the other forum members.

I would have said that pendulum08.jpg is correct.  If you do not understand, consult your Physics Professors or Friends.

[chrisC]

I am glad that Top Gun is answering all the technical questions.

Patience is not one of my virtues.  Teaching on the Internet is a skill I never acquired.

I am enjoying the show like many of the other forum members.

I would have said that pendulum08.jpg is correct.  If you do not understand, consult your Physics Professors or Friends.

Hahaha! Another excuse again? This time it's not the lack of drill experience but your 'lack' of patience? No 'teaching' credentials on the internet? Can't explain the screwed up Physics anymore?

So, are you giving up now? OK, maybe you can now blame it on "Top Gun" for not being able to cover you when you have no more excuses!

Seriously, go see a doctor or simply admit you're a screwed up, not quite 'O' level standard physicist!

cheers
chrisC

[Kul_ash]

I am glad that Top Gun is answering all the technical questions.

Patience is not one of my virtues.  Teaching on the Internet is a skill I never acquired.

I am enjoying the show like many of the other forum members.

I would have said that pendulum08.jpg is correct.  If you do not understand, consult your Physics Professors or Friends.

Dear Me. Tseung

I will sure consult one if my basic questions on your contradictions those I posted in my last reply are answered. If you can not teach on internet, it is ok. But then atleast give us valid results from millions of experiments you conducted.
You showed your theory in your patent application which was reviwed by the best in the industry. We are small people but they are not. They raised the same questions we did. What will any other professor you think, who him self is not tought (according to you) with new principles, how will they help us? It is you, who should come up with answers.

what is there in pendulum 8 or slide no. 3? We know how to calculate the force diagram. The point is not that. I already mentioned that if we consider simply three forces, then your diagram is correct but when it comes in view of SHM of pendulum and inferrence based on it, then it is totally incorrect. I showed problems in your assumptions. Why would any one else even bother to clear them? And they are simple questions.

Fortunately we also know basic maths and physics. We also know that the questions asked by us are valid as they are asked by the best in the industry. Who's job is to prove it to them? Who is going to be benifitted if your theory is proved, you or us? You started this forum and now you are asking us to take help from some one else. What is the use of your forum then?

[Koen1]

I am glad that Top Gun is answering all the technical questions.

and suspiciously is using all your own arguments and even style of writing... 

Patience is not one of my virtues.  Teaching on the Internet is a skill I never acquired.

much like the skill of logical reasoning seems to have passed you by

I am enjoying the show like many of the other forum members.

ehm... dude, it's your own theory! And you are "Top Gun"!
who do you think you're fooling?

I would have said that pendulum08.jpg is correct.

Yes, we know you would. And you would have and actually have
kept repeating your own dumb mistakes like you are currently doing
under your persona "Top Gun", and we would continuously have pointed
out the mistakes and errors like we have been doing and have done
so often before, and you would have simply ignored valid objections
and kept repeating that you're right and we're not without any proof,
like you are still doing and like I expect you to do as your "Top Gun" persona
before long, when you realise you can't get out of the hole you've dug for
yourself with your flawed physics that will never stand empirical testing.

If you do not understand, consult your Physics Professors or Friends.

Why don't you take your own advice and study some prysics before you
start telling us to do so? It is clear many here have more knowledge of physics
than you do.
If you still feel that you do understand physics, even though you have shown not to,
then why don't you explain your theory properly? And that means not just juggling
formulae that don't match to get impossible outcomes, but it also means explaining it
in normal language. Any good physicist should be able to explain his use of formulae
and view of the active processes and forces involved in proper human language.
I know you think you can confuse people by switching to your formulae and
trying to make the left shoe fit the right foot by incorrectly applying formulae and
hoping that people don't notice. But it is clear that does not work.

Why don't you end this charade, "Tseung"?
Stop lying, stop making totally unsupported claims, stop claiming there is proof
when there isn't. Just admit you were talking crap because you don't know what
you're talking about.


[/quote]