The Lee-Tseung Lead Out Theory

[WilbyInebriated]

Fine, I apologize with caramel cake and flowers and take back my arrogant accusation that you have in the past ever lent Lawrence any support whatsoever.  So let's not talk anymore about anyone falsely accusing you of anything and let's stick to the topic.

Now, what do you think of his theories and what do you think of his seminar fees?  Do you think it's a scam or do you think it's on the level or do you think it's something else?

fine, i won't say anymore until you do it again. yes, lets stick to topic, you have that terrible habit of dragging it off topic and baiting others to respond.

i think it's something else.

[spoondini]

I hope/want it to be on the level.  In 'think' it's as likely as flying saucers at the olympics.  I hope my thoughts are wrong.

[Top Gun]

The importance of the Feedback Mechanism

Dear Mr. Tseung,

I was looking at your Input at 12V and current at 2 Amps.  You assumed that the maximum Input Power was 24 watts.  You believed that the actual Input Power was less than that as the actual input was pulsed.  You used the total width of the magnets divided by the circumference to get an estimated factor (0.29)

You also measured the average Input Voltage at the Relay and that value was much less than 12V (1.8 to 4V).  That provided a better estimate of the Input Voltage.  It also reflected the actual experimental readings.

Your measured the Output AC voltage.  The best result was 30V with a resistive load of 15 ohms.  You then used the formula P=VxV/R and obtained a result of 60 watts.  Your standard AC amp meter failed to register any reading as the hertz value was not 50 or 60.  It was dependent on your rotational rate.

You then believed that you had achieved an overunity factor of 2.5 (60/24).  You believed that the actual value may be even higher because of the Pulsing.

However, to get a 5KW output (5,000 watts), you need an Overunity factor of 208 (5000/24).  I believe that the only possible way is to improve your feedback mechanism.  You do not have any at present. If more than 24 watts were fed back to input, you can achieve overunity factor of a few hundred by multiple looping.

Hope this gives you and everyone some food for thought.

[ltseung888]

Some concrete results from the 60 cm Lead-Out Energy Prototype

I played with the 60 cm Lead-Out Energy Prototype this morning and confirmed the following:

1.   When the wheel was rotating with no load, very little Input Energy was required to maintain the rotation. 
2.   The  Battery was 12V.  But with the Pulsing, only a small percentage of time was the battery turned on to provide power.  In the example, the effective Voltage was only 0.5 Volts.
3.   With a 4 collector coil with 2 in parallel configuration, a convincing overunity factor of 4.62 was achieved.  The Output Power was 2.31 watts and the Input Power was 0.5 watts.
4.   The above result was achieved with 4 magnets removed from the small tuning wheel with magnets.
5.   The result was even better with only 3 magnets removed.  The Overunity factor was 7.84.
6.   We shall take the scope readings when it becomes available.  I am sure that the Six Universities have good oscilloscopes.  It would give the Professors and their Research Students something to do.

I believe we now have the configuration for the Dry Run on November 5-8 at the Hong Kong Science Park nailed down.  Tong Po Chi is working on the high Output Energy version.  That may not be ready but we do have something to show.  We now can reproduce a working prototype as shown within 1 week.  We are confident of providing successful Training Courses. 

[broli]

How much would it cost to independently replicate that?