The Lee-Tseung Lead Out Theory

[Paul-R]

Lawrence, thanks for you updates again.

At my side, my bicycle wheel has not arrived yet.
Also, its very hard to get hold of AWG 16 type of copperwire.
All I have is AWG 24 right now.

You can get AWG 18/19 from the heavy current coil on the
transformer of a microwave oven. The coil weighs 400grams.
(The other coil is AWG 24, weighing 825g).

Hard work. You will have to cut through the steel with an
angle grinder, and soak the transformer in water overnight
to get the paper/card padding soft enough to slide the coils
out.

Recycling centres are full of microwave ovens.

All values approx.

[teslaalset]

You can get AWG 18/19 from the heavy current coil on the
transformer of a microwave oven. The coil weighs 400grams.
(The other coil is AWG 24, weighing 825g).

Aha, good tip Paul. Thanks.
I'll have a look at old wash machine motors too.
New wire is quite expensive....

[chrisC]

Are you saying you have won the Overunity Prize?  Why is there no announcement about this on the Overunity Prize forum?

I think Lawrence thinks they've not only won the Overunity prize but also the Nobel Prize for scientific accomplishment of every type. For what it's worth, I'll give him the prize for delusional perseverance. Pathetic as it is, it's so sad to see someone waste so much time and energy in believing in their own crap. As the saying goes, 'a little knowledge is a dangerous thing'!. How true.

cheers
chrisC

[utilitarian]

Lawrence, thanks for you updates again.

At my side, my bicycle wheel has not arrived yet.
Also, its very hard to get hold of AWG 16 type of coperwire.
All I have is AWG 24 right now.

I know you are trying to stay open minded, but I cannot believe you are falling for this scam artist.  Lawrence is not some well-meaning, but perhaps misguided, researcher.  He is an outright fraudster.  Too bad the Steorn forum is down, but look at this thread from Besslerwheel.com (moved to their "fraud" section) from a few years back.

http://besslerwheel.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=1419

He has basically been pitching the same line for a few years now.  On the Steorn forum, he was asking for a US$1 Million deposit from investors, based on the same level of evidence as now.  M.O. was the same - jump around from idea to idea in the hope that something sticks, meanwhile providing badly photoshopped/staged photos as some kind of evidence, while not really explaining how all these supposedly great inventions, miraculously hidden from all media, even relate to what he is doing himself and what equity he can actually provide to any potential investor.

I take it he never got a million dollars from any sucker, so he has lowered his asking price to about $20K.   And I guess he realized that no one is going to pay money on the strength of some photoshops and a handful of low-res photos, so he cobbled together a battery-powered crude wooden contraption with some meters.

I realize you are not considering investing, but don't spend alot of money doing replications - it's all garbage.  Just look at it.  Note the date on the very bottom photo - from 2000!  So for 10 years this miraculous device has existed and not one practical application or one mention in any reputable media publication!  Please.

And just go back to the beginning of the thread, where Tseung makes this wild claim about the pendulum and the tension in the string doing work by lifting the pendulum bob.  It's completely wrong, refuted effectively be several knowledgable forum members, but Tseung continuously makes the contradictory argument that his version of the pendulum theory/lead out theory both obeys the current laws of physics (conservation of energy laws) and contradicts them by showing how you can get energy for nothing.  It's all just so much crazy nonsense.

[teslaalset]

I realize you are not considering investing, but don't spend alot of money doing replications - it's all garbage.  Just look at it.  Note the date on the very bottom photo - from 2000!  So for 10 years this miraculous device has existed and not one practical application or one mention in any reputable media publication!  Please.

And just go back to the beginning of the thread, where Tseung makes this wild claim about the pendulum and the tension in the string doing work by lifting the pendulum bob.  It's completely wrong, refuted effectively be several knowledgable forum members, but Tseung continuously makes the contradictory argument that his version of the pendulum theory/lead out theory both obeys the current laws of physics (conservation of energy laws) and contradicts them by showing how you can get energy for nothing.  It's all just so much crazy nonsense.

Thanks for the link and the hints. I'll read them carefully.

You are correct, I am not investing in taking an instruction trip:
1) I don't have the time available
2) I don't have good reference of other people attending this course with a positive feedback

The investments I am making are well thought of. The bicycle wheel, which is on its way, can easily be mounted on my bike, this is the main reason why I bought it. I will use it for present discussed experiments first.

Since nobody still active in this forum has ever tried to replicate, I will still have a go with it.
My feedback could give this thread a more definitive end, either positive or negative.
See it as my contribution to this forum.

I still see this as a variation on the Bedini concept, except for the bifilar coil used to detect the trigger for powering a driving coil. It's still out of the box thinking. Without it, new technology will not be discovered.

Even though I might not be successful in achieving overunity with this exercise, it will still be some fun. Much better than watching, mostly useless, TV.