The Lee-Tseung Lead Out Theory

[chrisC]

You have been told where to go for explanations, chrisC. You are either a wanker or someone
who is paid to attempt to sow dischord.

There is, of course, a third alternative; namely that you are both.

Well, Mr. Paul_R. Judging from your unabashed support of this Lee-Tseung crap, you are either delusional like Lawrence or simply another unschooled wannabe fame-seeker.

ps: You can't pay me enough to generate 'discord' on this forum. Sitting and passing time in your stone cold London flat can't be that exciting either.

cheers
chrisC

[ltseung888]

Yes if you are measuring across a resistor then I see no problem. But the full wave bridge rectifier (FWBR) suggestion still applies. I don't know about the input/output voltages are but if the COP is high and since your input is DC one should be able to simply use a transformer with a FWBR and filter behind it. These parts are quite cheap.

Dear Broli,

Thank you for your constructive suggestion.  We do plan to convert the output to DC so that we can recharge or charge a used battery.  Just need some time.

Let me share the following with other inventors or experimenters.
1.   Our prototype demonstrated overuity on Oct 10.  The Input was from a 12 V battery drawing 2 amps.  The Output was measured with a meter and showed 30 V AC.  The resistive load we put on was 15 ohms.  When there was no load (infinite resistance), the Output voltage reading was 40 V AC.  In other words, the drop in AC voltmeter reading was from 40 to 30.  That was expected when we put load on the Output.
2.   The first test ran for about 40 minutes with the 15 ohm resistor.  Then we heard a noise and the device stopped working â€" not even rotating.  On examination, we found that we did not screw the proximity switch tightly.  We allowed slight movement so that we could fine tune.  Apparently, the rotating and vibration of the wheel shook it out of position totally â€" about 3 mm from the set position!
3.   We then restarted the device with the proximity switch tightly screwed.  I left after one and half hours with the wheel running smoothly all that time.  Mr. Tong Po Chi continued to let it run for a few more hours before he went home.
4.   Mr. Tong did some “tidying and beautifying” so that the device would be more presentable to the General Public.  That included removing the non-function parts and some rewiring.
5.   Our first visitor came unexpectedly before we double checked the wheel.  When we turned on the switch, nothing happened.  After some checking, Mr. Tong found a disconnected wire.  After connecting it back, the device rotated. 
6.   The Input was still 12V and 2 Amps from the battery.  The Output dropped from 30V to 6V AC.  We were in panic mode.  The visitor initially displayed his knowledge of electrical engineering and made many suggestions.  We tried many new ways. None of them worked.  The visitor left frustrated.
7.   We then rechecked and re-experimented.  We soon found that in removing the non-function part from the rotating shaft, we changed the characteristics of the Wheel.  The “lead-out energy pulse frequency” and rotational speed shifted.  We no longer had the correct “Pulsing frequency”.
8.   I believe many other overunity inventors met the same fate before.  They had glimpses of overunity.  Some seemingly unrelated changes shifted the “pulsing frequency” and the glimpse was gone.  We now have experienced this first hand.  The advice is not to lose heart.  Re-tune or go back to the previous condition.  Freeze the set up after a successful result.  Build a second prototype.  DO NOT keep working on the successful one.  Any work may shift the “overunity pulsing frequency”. 
9.   The success of our Lead-Out Energy Machine is affected by some small adjustments â€" the distance between coil and magnet (< 2mm), angle of tilt of the magnets (a few degrees), the setting of the proximity switch (a few mm), the actual external load (resistor value and rotational load).  Our prototype size is 900mm.  The critical adjustments are a few mm.  No wonder that there are many frustrated researchers out there.  (We failed with the previous 7 groups!)
10.   We are working on some tuning tools so as to make our Lead-Out Energy Machines more tolerant.  At present, I think the only product should be the 5 day training course.  The students will have a working prototype to see first.  They have the instructor to help them disassemble and re-assemble it.  (There is a possibility that the students may try some improvements and the working prototype may become non-functional.  However, there is also the possibility that the functionality may improve.  We shall take the chance as the name of our Company is Help Seedlings Innovate Foundation Limited.  No risk, no gain.)

We are lucky to have frozen work on some previous prototypes.  Some of these are in three different locations - a very wise management decision. Thus we always have something to show â€" though not the latest and greatest.  Hope the above actual experience can help other frustrated inventors.

Lawrence Tseung
Director
Help Seedlings Innovate Foundation Limited.

[ltseung888]

The non-function part Mr. Tong removed.

Some  one asked the above question.  Why would the Output voltage drop from 30 volts to 6 volts?

The non-function part was the trial control for the proximity switch.  It was a small wheel clamped onto the shaft.  Thus it rotates at the same rate as the large wheel.  There were 16 small magnets situation at close to the rim of the wheel.  We found that the magnets were too close to each other.  The on-off mechanism was on most of the time.

However, the 16 small magnets interacted with the magnetic field of the device in some undetermined way.  Removing the small wheel and the magnets shifted the “pulsing mechanism” significantly.

We may put it back and call it “tuning mechanism” so that we could reproduce the overunity condition.  However, we have other  things to try first.

Lawrence
Director
Help Seedlings Innovate Foundation Limited

[ltseung888]

Some insight into the testing

When the Prototype was ready for testing on Oct 2, we tried the following:

1.   Use the new set up of the proximity switch.  Use two collector coils and from 1 to16 drive coils.
2.   The Input was 12V and the current reading from the meter was between 2 to 3 amps no matter how many drive coils were turned on.  The Output at no load was 20V AC.  When we put a resistive load of 10 ohms, the Output voltage dropped to 2V AC.  No overunity effect was observed.
3.   We played with it and one of the small magnets on the small wheel got attracted to its neighbor.  When I removed it, the Output voltage at no load jumped to 50 V AC.  We then discussed the possibility and the advantages of the unbalanced wheel.
4.   On Oct 7, we decided to change the collector coils.  The number of turns was large and the wire was thin (0.3mm).  The ohm value was close to 100.  We also decided to switch back to the old proximity switch arrangement.
5.   On Oct 10, we used some of the driver coils (0.5mm 5 ohms) as collector coils.  When we used 1 coil, the output voltage was 4 V with a resistive load of 15 ohms.
6.   We sensed something and used 3 collector coils.  The output voltage was 20 V with the resistive load of 15 ohms.
7.   We then used 4 collector coils.  The output voltage was 30 V with the same resistive load of 15 ohms.  Since Power = Volt x Volt/Resistance, we got the output power as 30 x 30 / 15 or 60 watts.  The Input was 12 V, 2 Amp and thus the input power was 24 watts.
8.   At no load, the output voltage reading was 40V AC.  We repeated the set up multiple times.  The overunity result was reproducible.  We then let it run for hours.  The rest was history.

As you can see â€" the experiment did not meet with success on the first attempt.  However, I firmly insisted that it was a matter of tuning as predicted by the Lead-Out Theory.  It took over 1 week and hundreds of attempts before we hit on the “overunity pulsing condition”.  Many experimenters without the dogged devotion would have given up. (It may take us many days to get positive results again with the new set up but we have the old set up to fall back on).

[tagor]

8.   At no load, the output voltage reading was 40V AC.  We repeated the set up multiple times.  The overunity result was reproducible.  We then let it run for hours.  The rest was history.

can you sell me one of your replications ?