The Lee-Tseung Lead Out Theory

[gaby de wilde]

Using multiple pulses takes a lot of stress off the bearings. ...

I will let you in on a little secret. The direction of the pulse should be almost straight towards the axle. It should also have some spring like storage. The pulse can then oppose the centrifugal forces and lead out it's power over a range of degrees rather then over a small angle of rotation.

Now for the flux:
Say the wheel has north poles facing outwards. The pulse coils have a ferromagnetic core.

Now we place an additional north pole BEHIND the coil.

The purpose of this magnet is to induct a bit of flux into the core.

The flux inducted into the core should not be enough to repel the rotor magnets by a very small bit.

The rotor magnet should also be able to induct it's field into the core.

We now have 2 opposing fields inducted into the core.

A slight pulse will be enough to generate FULL repulsion in this configuration.

But if you really want godly powers out of the machine then you make this happen by utilising back emf alone.

So the stator coil attracts the rotor magnet.

Then the flux collapses in the coil.

Now we get FULL repulsion at no cost of any kind.

Now I'm going back to my 100% permanent magnet designs. *hahaha*

5. This is what we mean by adjusting the input according to the output load. Most of the overunity developers have not done this( Newman, Bedini, Adams etc.)

But the rotoverter researchers have addressed this topic.

http://www.google.com/search?q=rotoverter

Gaby,

This post is very high quality.  The suggestions will be carefully considered.

Regards,

Lawrence

I call it flux surfing. ^__^

If you rotate the stator magnet by 90 degrees you should be able to run the thing without any coils.

You can make it so that the repulsive front side doesn't get repelled until the backside is inducting it's field into it.

The field inducted by the rear end of the rotor magnet compliments the field inducted by the magnet that sits behind the core. Together they will fully saturnise the core.

This will both push and pull the magnet forwards, the strength of the push is very clear the pulling force is not much bigger a loss as a gain. The push is free.

[tinu]

Using multiple pulses takes a lot of stress off the bearings. ...

I will let you in on a little secret. The direction of the pulse should be almost straight towards the axle. It should also have some spring like storage. The pulse can then oppose the centrifugal forces and lead out it's power over a range of degrees rather then over a small angle of rotation.

Now for the flux:
Say the wheel has north poles facing outwards. The pulse coils have a ferromagnetic core.

Now we place an additional north pole BEHIND the coil.

The purpose of this magnet is to induct a bit of flux into the core.

The flux inducted into the core should not be enough to repel the rotor magnets by a very small bit.

The rotor magnet should also be able to induct it's field into the core.

We now have 2 opposing fields inducted into the core.

A slight pulse will be enough to generate FULL repulsion in this configuration.

But if you really want godly powers out of the machine then you make this happen by utilising back emf alone.

So the stator coil attracts the rotor magnet.

Then the flux collapses in the coil.

Now we get FULL repulsion at no cost of any kind.

Now I'm going back to my 100% permanent magnet designs. *hahaha*

5. This is what we mean by adjusting the input according to the output load. Most of the overunity developers have not done this( Newman, Bedini, Adams etc.)

But the rotoverter researchers have addressed this topic.

http://www.google.com/search?q=rotoverter

Gaby,

This post is very high quality.  The suggestions will be carefully considered.

Regards,

Lawrence

I call it flux surfing. ^__^

If you rotate the stator magnet by 90 degrees you should be able to run the thing without any coils.

You can make it so that the repulsive front side doesn't get repelled until the backside is inducting it's field into it.

The field inducted by the rear end of the rotor magnet compliments the field inducted by the magnet that sits behind the core. Together they will fully saturnise the core.

This will both push and pull the magnet forwards, the strength of the push is very clear the pulling force is not much bigger a loss as a gain. The push is free.

Very interesting!
Can you post a movie?

Tx,
Tinu

[gaby de wilde]

Here is another idea,

Say we have just a rotor magnet and a stator magnet attracting another.

If we give the rotor a swing it goes fast enough to pass it. The interaction has an escape velocity.

While it's attracted the rotor first accelerates then (during escape) it's speed is reduced again.

The slower the rotor moves the more % speed it gains from the attraction. Escaping the attraction at low speed doesn't allow for a lot of attraction.

Now I'm going to preform a miracle. (haha)

I'm going to make it so that the rotor spins in one direction and the armature spins in the other.

Now one would think we have exactly the same situation going on but in fact we now have a resonant system.

The minimum approach speed to accomplish the escape velocity is cut in half.

*grin*

[acerzw]

<removed>

[ltseung888]

Let me put my understanding of Gaby's Improvement in pictorial form.

A = rotating inner cylinder in the clockwise direction
B = non-rotating ring of coils that can be switched on and off
C = non-rotating ring of permanent magnets suggested by Gaby.

With the magnetic poles as shown, if the coil in B has current off, the permanent magnet in C will induce a S pole (in coil at B) facing the rotating magnets in A.  This effectively causes an attraction with the next coming permanent magnet in A (which is beneficial) causing further force to turn the cylinder A in the clockwise direction.

The permanent magnet in C does not draw any current.  Gaby has improved the efficiency of the device!

This multiple ring concept is getting closer to the John Searl device.  Let us have more of these brilliant ideas.

Lawrence Tseung
Gaby?s brilliant ideas Lead Out resonance from equally brilliant minds.