The Lee-Tseung Lead Out Theory

[Koen1]

funny how you so proudly mention talking about your "brilliant" "experiments" like the "boat on calm water on a sunny day" and the "wire tied to bottle",
but you seem totally unwilling or unable to share the details of these "experiments" with us...

How do these show that "your theory" works?
How does the example of running a boat on solar power demostrate the viability of your hypothesis, and how does it show in what practical manner we can actually extract energy from the gravitational field?

PLEASE finally explain this to us, instead of continually presenting little talks you had with people as "proof". It's very nice that there are apparently people who are convinced your hypothesis is valid even though you apparently do not show them any proof either, but we have been asking you do explain how your dodgy "experiments" prove that we can "lead out" energy from gravity for ages now and you appear to ignore them structurally.

Why do you not post any replies on that? Why do you only post replies that serve to support your side of the story only on the point that people apparently discuss your hypothesis with you, but not on the point of  proving your actual hypothesis itself? Oh, and forking up a bunch of formulae is one thing, but actually presenting a testable setup that proves your formula juggling to result in actual practical output would be the actual proof.
Why do you seem so intent on avoiding actual discussion of experiments that can prove that we can really extract energy from gravity in a perpetually moving system?
You must understand that no matter how many discussion with other (be they existant or not) people you post, as long as you avoid the actual test phase and discussion about it, you do not come across as very trustworthy, sincere, honest, nor cooperative.

I assume you will not reply to this post as you choose to ignore all posts of this nature, but I'd still like to point out that if you keep ignoring this type of posts, it only serves to undermine your own credibility.

[Eddy Currentz]

BTW, I've built several Bedini motors that worked every bit as good as he said they would. Most people don't know how to follow directions and then whine about their motors not working. Bedini knows what he's doing. 

Dear Mr. Eddy Currentz,

I am very interested in a working Bedini motor.  I am confident that we can improve it to meet the AERO competition requirements together.

Email me at ltseung@hotmail.com.  I do not normally answer private emails but this is an exception.

Thank You.

Lawrence Tseung

Thanks for the offer but I don't own that technology. You should contact Mr. Bedini about any development of his technology.
In spite of the large volume of ridicule and criticism here, I do enjoy, and have greatly benefited from your insightful teachings and would like to express my thanks.
The cultural differences between east and west often make it difficult for some people to appreciate your style of dissemination. Westerners tend to want only hard data since that is their only source of comparison. They tend to feel comfortable only when they can fit your concepts into their preconceived box. An analogous representation of a theory tends to confuse those who can only deal with numbers. Unfortunately, these types will resort to ridicule and blame when they don't get what they want. I hope you are able to understand this and not let this type of behavior become discouraging.

Cheers,

Ted

[Eden]

[/quote]Thanks for the offer but I don't own that technology. You should contact Mr. Bedini about any development of his technology.
In spite of the large volume of ridicule and criticism here, I do enjoy, and have greatly benefited from your insightful teachings and would like to express my thanks.
The cultural differences between east and west often make it difficult for some people to appreciate your style of dissemination. Westerners tend to want only hard data since that is their only source of comparison. They tend to feel comfortable only when they can fit your concepts into their preconceived box. An analogous representation of a theory tends to confuse those who can only deal with numbers. Unfortunately, these types will resort to ridicule and blame when they don't get what they want. I hope you are able to understand this and not let this type of behavior become discouraging.

Cheers,

Ted
[/quote]

well said ted!
people are either afraid of the unknown, or ridicule it.
and indeed westerners (being one myself) have difficulty in understanding other cultures...

Bill, Hans & others,
you deliver magnificent work in other topics. keep them all serene, and concentrate on positive contribution, it is so much needed...

Eden

[ltseung888]

funny how you so proudly mention talking about your "brilliant" "experiments" like the "boat on calm water on a sunny day" and the "wire tied to bottle",
but you seem totally unwilling or unable to share the details of these "experiments" with us...

How do these show that "your theory" works?
How does the example of running a boat on solar power demostrate the viability of your hypothesis, and how does it show in what practical manner we can actually extract energy from the gravitational field?
.....

Simply stated in our patent - the Lee-Tseung theory predicts that we can Lead Out gravitational or electron motion energy via oscillation, vibration, rotation or flux changes.

Many existing known OU devices already confirm our theory.  The most solid one you can buy today is the Hungarian EBM.  It is pulsed rotation in magnetic fields.

For oscillations examples, see the Milkovic pendulum thread on this forum.

For rotation in gravitational fields, see the Chas Campbell thread.

For rotation in magnetic fields, see the Newman, Bedini, threads.

For flux change systems, see the Tom Beardon thread.

The example of boat in calm water and good sunshine shows that if you know how to use gravitational or electron motion energy (like Lee, Tseung, Wang Tsing Hua University, Gaby, Ash, Stefan), you do not need to worry about the objection that you violated the Law of Conservation of Energy.  You are not building the impossible perpetual motion machine.

Please read the file in reply 643 to get the full picture.

[Koen1]

@ Eden:
ah of course, it is us "westerners" that have trouble understanding other cultures, and that is why we don't see the proof that mr Tseung never posted?
similarly we could say "easterners" have trouble understanding "western" culture, and that is why he is not able to give a form of proof that we "westerners" find satisfactory.

But that seems quite arbitrary, as we are not discussing cultural differences, we are discussing hard scientific theory and application, which is presented to us in a "western" based style of Newtonian physics, but lacking the proof that is so crucial to that same "western" scientific method.
Seems quite delusional to blame the inability of an "eastern" inventor to deliver proof on the assumed inability of "westerners" to understand his cultural background...