The Lee-Tseung Lead Out Theory

[ltseung888]

Beach Pump Picture 3

The same lady using the double pump method could pump water to the fifth floor with little difficulty.

This picture showed the action at ground level with Tseung holding the short tube.  Water+air jetted out to great distances.  However, the flow was not continuous.  It was in bursts depending on the pumping rate of the lady.

Mr. Bill Fung is considering a repeat of the experiment in his seventh floor apartment.  You can beat him to it.

[ltseung888]

Beach Pump Picture 4

This particular experiment pumped water to five floors up.  The water flow depended on how fast the person operated the double pump.  Different persons tried the pumping.  Even the most gentle of the ladies managed to pump water five floors up.  The water rate was estimated from how much water disappeared from the water tank (Plastic Box).

The one-way valves were from the beach pumps.  Each pump provided two valves.  We had to be careful to ensure they were set up properly.  The particular arrangement was to space these one-way valves every 3 meters.

The same arrangement was used to pump water to at least 8 floors.  Some bright soul went out to buy air pumps.  Consistent experimental results were obtained.  Much greater height was achieved.  Water delivery rates were measured.  Much  experimental data was obtained with different pumps, different heights, different one-way valves, different pipes and different water+air flow rates.  However such detailed data are confidential and belong to the experimenters.  They are using such data to negotiate contracts.

[ltseung888]

Well, in fact, have you yourself read post 644 for example?

The post 644 was from Tinu.  He disagreed with the concept of Lead Out.
I tried to inform him that a perfect horizontal force could not do vertical work and thus the vertical energy could not have come from the horizontal force.

As you can read from his response.  He disgreed.  To him, all the other posts and reasoning must be junk. 

Please study 643 and 758 carefully. 

Lawrence Tseung
Not understanding 643 and 758 Leads Out junk arguments.

[Pirate88179]

Lawrence:

This is getting better.  Thank you for posting real experiments.  That is what a lot of people on here have been asking for, and I don't blame them.  The only thing I see, as a non-physicist, is that, with 2 pumps you are inputting twice the energy to your system and the way you present it is as if you don't account for that extra energy input.  My simple analogy, if you have 1 person pushing on a bar you get x force but, if you have 2 people pushing on a bar you get 2 times x so therefore more energy out.  But, you had more energy in.

If the girl in the pictures pushes on 2 pumps she is supplying 2 times the original energy as if operating just the one.  Well, OK, maybe it takes a little less energy to pump air as opposed to water but still, there is more input right?  Please tell me where I am wrong in my assessment.  Do you take this into account in your evaluations?  I know I have joked (in good fun) about some of your proclamations but I am being serious here now at this time.  Your ideas are either so far out there that we can't grasp them, or you have a basic flaw in your calculations.  We, most of us, are just asking for more tangible demonstrations of your theory's before we can accept them.  These photos are a good start. (In my opinion)  If in the end we still disagree, then we can agree to do so.  And, I was never making fun of Forever, I do think she is pretty.  Let me know what you think.

Bill

[ltseung888]

Lawrence:

This is getting better.  Thank you for posting real experiments. 

If the girl in the pictures pushes on 2 pumps she is supplying 2 times the original energy as if operating just the one. 
Bill

As Physicists, we do not rely on muscle power for reliable data.  That experiment was a "concept validation".  It pointed to the right direction ? energy from air could be used.

For reliable data, we used the electric air pump in the steady state.  We could measure the Input Pump Energy in various ways.  The rough one is its rated power x time.  The more accurate one is to use additional volt and amp meters.  Thus we can determine the Input Energy Ein reasonably accurately.  The output energy Eout is calculated from mgh where m = mass of water transferred at the same time interval, g = gravitational constant and h = height elevated.

Once we found that Eout can be greater than Ein, we claimed success.  I did not do the part where we allowed the elevated water to flow down to drive an electricity generator.  Hopefully, the generator would supply enough power to drive the air pump and more.  Then we would have an absolutely confirmed case of a Cosmic Energy Machine using Energy from Still Air.  That task was left to Mr. Jimmy Fung, a certified electrical engineer.  Mr. Fung was looking for tinny hydroelectric generators when he unfortunately had a stroke.

We also learned the technique of Leading Out energy from gravity directly.  Those Cosmic Energy Machines are much more efficient. 

We sent a copy of the experimental apparatus shown on this thread to Beijing to ensure that we had ?proof of concept? for our patent.  I freely give the experimental method to the World, especially the developing countries. 

However, the engineers who did the actual prototypes and measurements spent much money and time.  They would like a return on their investment.  The hard experimental data belonged to them and they are negotiating for actual contracts.  It is being marketed as an efficient water transportation system and NOT an OU device.