The Lee-Tseung Lead Out Theory

[Devil]

Please consult a physicist friend.  Ask him what is meant by
Force = Rate of change of momentum.

I just do not know how to explain to layman such kindergarten physics concepts.

Perhaps I did not use the correct terminology in my earlier post.

Yes, I agree with your definition of force.  For example, gravity is a force and causes a rate of change in momentum (i.e. acceleration) by a free-falling object.  However, that does not get you where you want to be. 

In space, let's say you take two objects of equal mass, but one is soft like a nerf ball and the other is a hard baseball.  You hurl the two objects toward each other with equal speeds, so you have the very large nerf ball and the small baseball on a collision course.  After the two objects collide, I predict that neither will continue any forward motion.  Based on your theory, however, the baseball should continue forward.  Is that correct?

shruggedatlas, say you want to visit me by jumping from the fourth floor.  You boyfriend tries to prevent that by
(1)   Placing an iron plate on the ground.
(2)   Place an air cushion on the ground.

Just before hitting the ground, you have the same momentum (mass x velocity).  In case (1), your velocity changes from V to 0 rapidly.  The force exerted by you on the iron plate and the reaction by the iron plate on you will be very large.  You successfully visit me.

In case (2), your velocity changes from V to 0 slowly.  The force (= rate of change of momentum) exerted by you on the air cushion and the reaction by the air cushion on you will be much smaller than case (1).  Your boy friend will be able to hug and kiss you.

You can now re-examine the silly cartoons by Tseung.  If you still do not understand, cry again.

[gaby de wilde]

What you just demonstrated is the Tseung scientific method:

1.  Come up with an idea
2.  Make a drawing of it
3.  Do not test it
4.  Conclude that it must work
5.  Tell the world

This explains alot about how you arrived at your concepts.

This is good! The method is even simpeler as that. Point 1 is not to come up with an idea but to start out by looking at other peoples ideas. (2) would be to speculate what one could improve combine or enhance. Study and speculation indeed comes before building things. Speculation does not mean "concluding it must work". This is how inventions are done. There isn't any other way.   Come up with an idea and make a drawing of it

But you want something like:

1 - Receive complete invention from God or other divine source.

2 - Snap fingers for replications and financing

3 - Re-write all physics books on a Sunday afternoon.

4 - Patent the perpetual motion apparatus using snap finger funding.

5 - Peer review the perpetual motion machine.

6 - Destroy your IP by teaching the armchair skeptics how to build the device for free and at no charge.

7 - Suffer liberous irrational armchair debunkery.

8 - Respect remote viewing scientists who have envisioned a divine fraud claim.

9 - and last but not least: "Be a humble victim."

Keep rubbing the lamp I would say.

[shruggedatlas]

shruggedatlas, say you want to visit me by jumping from the fourth floor.  You boyfriend tries to prevent that by
(1)   Placing an iron plate on the ground.
(2)   Place an air cushion on the ground.

Just before hitting the ground, you have the same momentum (mass x velocity).  In case (1), your velocity changes from V to 0 rapidly.  The force exerted by you on the iron plate and the reaction by the iron plate on you will be very large.  You successfully visit me.

In case (2), your velocity changes from V to 0 slowly.  The force (= rate of change of momentum) exerted by you on the air cushion and the reaction by the air cushion on you will be much smaller than case (1).  Your boy friend will be able to hug and kiss you.

You can now re-examine the silly cartoons by Tseung.  If you still do not understand, cry again.

Certainly, an object cushioned against a fall is less likely to sustain damage.  However, this has nothing to do with the propulsion system you propose.  The energy absorbed by the ground is the same, whether I fall on a pillow or land on my feet.

You never answered my hopothetical.  Do you believe the harder object, the baseball, will retain some of its forward motion after the collision with the soft foam ball (of equal mass)?  The objects are travelling at equal speeds toward each other in gravity-free space.

[gaby de wilde]

Thus blindly enclosing the entity in a black box and apply Newton's Third Law without examining the detailed interactions is stupid and against established Physics.

Zero point energy means the universe is like a snowglobe.  All objects are submerged in a substance. Even a closed box is subjected to "air" flowing against it.

This "air" is always moving, if we would move our object in the same direction, just below the speed of the "air" it would pick up energy from this "air" stream. However, moving it faster or in opposite direction "dissipates" the energy into "air" motion.

We may of course (rather then 100% linearly) do the same with frequencies. Vibrate or rotate an object. Then accelerate it while it moves to the left, and decelerate while it moves to the right. Then get linear trust 100% mechanically. Reaction forces from acceleration and deceleration both point to the right.

But trust me the ?roflutter drive is far more amusing.

http://www.overunity.com/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=2794.0;attach=17596;image

Look how simple it is? It's actually to simple to understand it? Isn't that hilarious? But please try describe what you think happens in the device, please walk though it step by step.

[langley]

Oh...and by the way to avoid having to make any disclaimers...any alleged pm's from me to any of the 'Mingmei's' or 'Forever' will have occurred in the reality of the storyline only...and not in real time.

You are not Mr. Bill,

The Kiss Kiss was meant for him, not you.

Mingmei