Why can't we get free energy from magnet motors, according to scientists?

[psychopath]

Guess what, conservation of energy is constantly being violated and physicists accept this! What am I talking about?

I am talking about virtual photons(read about quantum electrodynamics)!

Virtual photons everywhere in the universe. They are not real photons but they still have energy.

An electric charge is nothing but a cloud of virtual photons. Virtual photons are ejected and reabsorbed by the charge. The more energetic a virtual photon, the the less time it can exist before it is reabsorbed. So the more energy you borrow from nature, the quicker you have to pay it back.

Every single one of these virtual photons violate CoE. When a virtual photon is created, there is more net energy than before, the energy of the original particle plus the virtual photon!

[Omnibus]

The implication that free energy cannot be obtained in device containing permanent magnets is incorrect. I have proved conclusively that CoE can be violated and energy out of nothing (excess energy) can be produced in a discontinuous manner.

[shruggedatlas]

The implication that free energy cannot be obtained in device containing permanent magnets is incorrect. I have proved conclusively that CoE can be violated and energy out of nothing (excess energy) can be produced in a discontinuous manner.

I do not understand why you keep saying this about the SMOT (I presume it is the SMOT you are referring to).  I really want to understand, but I cannot.  Under your logic, if I put a paperclip next to a magnet and let got and the paperclip slides across the table and attaches to the magnet, is this free energy?  I cannot see how.  I have to pay for it when I pry the clip off the magnet.  Same with the SMOT.  The ball does travel, but the SMOT robs it of much of its velocity upon exit from the ramp, so much so in fact, that the ball cannot get back to the starting point, even given its higher elevation at the end.

All I ask is if you do cite equations, please explain what the terms mean.  I am not familiar with the abbreviations you have used in the past.  You are very self assured, but I think you are not accounting for something in your reasoning.

[Omnibus]

No, this is not what I mean. Read the appropriate threads to learn what the proof is.

[Nostradamus2]

.