'T.O.M.I. Flapper' applied to a S.M.O.T., Self-Runner...

[Dingus Mungus]

This is impudent nonsense which you continue to spew shamelessly. This should stop. It has been proven conclusively that SMOT violates CoE.

Believe it or not, I really hope that your correct and this device could work.
The supporting evidence simply has not impressed or convinced me yet.
I wish you luck in your experiments, but I still see no evidence of OU.

~Dingus Mungus

P.S. Can you post a link for all naysayers to the "conclusive" proof?
I hope this is much more conclusive then previous demos I've seen.

[Omnibus]

This is impudent nonsense which you continue to spew shamelessly. This should stop. It has been proven conclusively that SMOT violates CoE.

Believe it or not, I really hope that your correct and this device could work.
The supporting evidence simply has not impressed or convinced me yet.
I wish you luck in your experiments, but I still see no evidence of OU.

~Dingus Mungus

P.S. Can you post a link for all naysayers to the "conclusive" proof?
I hope this is much more conclusive then previous demos I've seen.

You're incompetent and whether or not you're convinced doesn't matter one bit. It would be prudent if you become more humble and be less categorical in your opinions. While this is a free forum and anyone can post anything, even nonsense, those concerned with the integrity of the field must also feel the freedom to make notes when incompetents such as you are trying to overwhelm the discussions.

[Dingus Mungus]

Can I still get that link?

Gravitational potential energy is measured as pe=GMh there for any loss in hieght is a conversion of potential energy. This is not nonsense... If there is an OU SMOT then it would return its ball to the original starting hieght or position, and either of those would be adiquate enough to prove your point.

Again good luck on your experiments.
~Dingus Mungus

[Omnibus]

Can I still get that link?

Gravitational potential energy is measured as pe=GMh there for any loss in hieght is a conversion of potential energy. This is not nonsense... If there is an OU SMOT then it would return its ball to the original starting hieght or position, and either of those would be adiquate enough to prove your point.

Again good luck on your experiments.
~Dingus Mungus

That's crap.

[Dingus Mungus]

 

If the ball gets closer to the ground it loses some gravitational potential energy.
That how hydroelectric works. It collects energy from velocity added to mass as it falls.
If the water could be put back to the same hieght it could fall again... Forever... Free...
With out returning to the same height you're just converting gravitational potential.

Sorry if this sounds like crap to you, but denying this simple fact weakens your case.

I still want to see the absolute proof you spoke of,
~Dingus Mungus