Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



New video on site of possible OU test fixture

Started by Butch, August 14, 2007, 06:23:35 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

Print
Go Down Pages 1 2 3 4 5 6
User actions

psychopath

#10
August 16, 2007, 06:55:39 AM
A SMOT(Simple Magnetic Overunity Toy) is a 1985 invention by Greg Watson from Australia which is supposed to be over unity. So far, there is no evidence of one that is looped.

But keep in mind, a looped SMOT is no longer a SMOT, that is, it is no longer Greg Watson's invention. In the patent it says it is simply a magnetic propulsion system.

I haven't built a SMOT yet, but I think the reason why so many people fail with this sort of thing is because they rely on the absence of friction. They expect the excess energy gained from each SMOT will let it keep going. I think what we need to do is basically "trap" it in a loop, instead of hoping it will have enough energy to pass some points. Although I might be wrong, as I have seen the video where when the ball is dropped from a SMOT it goes much further than dropping it without the magnets.

Also, I do not believe that Greg Watson built perpetual SMOTs as some people claim. All the talk about the "fine tuning" and friction minimizing seems a little bogus. Since there will always be friction, minimizing it is wasting your time(although it does help a little).

Omnibus

#11
August 16, 2007, 07:01:00 AM
"@Omnibus   What can I say?  Your stubbornness is exceeded only by your hostility and rudeness.  You claim you don't care what others think or about defining terms for discourse...why such rabid passion, then?  Good luck and God speed...chill out!"

That's crap. Please, restrain youself from spewing nonsens when you don't have scientific arguments.

Honk

#12
August 16, 2007, 07:47:20 AM
Quote from: Humbugger on August 16, 2007, 06:39:35 AM
@Honk    Love to see the video you refer to...haven't found anything like that.

I can email you an adress of a DC hub that you can enter at a specific point of time and then you can download it from me.
Just send me your email and I'll share the video.
Magnet Power equals Clean Power

acp

#13
August 16, 2007, 12:49:21 PM
@Omnibus,

Can you please provide a link where you show conclusively that the SMOT violates CoE.

Sorry if this is alraedy posted somewhere else, but I don't find it on this forum. Thanks.

Albert

nwman

#14
August 16, 2007, 03:43:46 PM
Quote from: acp on August 16, 2007, 12:49:21 PM
@Omnibus,

Can you please provide a link where you show conclusively that the SMOT violates CoE.

Sorry if this is alraedy posted somewhere else, but I don't find it on this forum. Thanks.

Albert

I too would like to see this!

Tim
Print
Go Up Pages 1 2 3 4 5 6
User actions