Need a tax write-off?

[gyulasun]

Hi All,

I wonder if the idea in this patent (if there is any merit in it...) has some familiarities with Dante's idea, see this link:
http://v3.espacenet.com/textdoc?DB=EPODOC&IDX=WO2004019476&F=0

Contact info: http://www.1000inventions.com/detail2.php?id=651

Gyula

[Navi-gator]

Hi All,

I wonder if the idea in this patent (if there is any merit in it...) has some familiarities with Dante's idea, see this link:
http://v3.espacenet.com/textdoc?DB=EPODOC&IDX=WO2004019476&F=0

Contact info: http://www.1000inventions.com/detail2.php?id=651

Gyula

I didn't read all of it, but your right it is similar. From your link...

In Patent No.GR1003255, a motor is installed in a box that drives shafts bearing gears. Thus the force produced is claimed to be multiplied many times and is propagated to the eight corners of the box. Placing self-activating dynamos that are driven by the gears at its comers, the original energy is claimed to be multiplied16-fold, recycling a dynamo so as to supply the engine, thus claiming a perpetual motion.

Patent No. GR 1002977, also claims to be a perpetual motion machine consisting of two similar, metal wheels which have gears; these gears are parallelepiped and form (camber) angles of 45 and135 degrees with the plane defined from the corresponding contact of the edge of the wheel to which they are connected. It is essentially a weight-gear arrangement.

Patent No. JP8042442, also claims to multiply electric power by electric power and obtain clean electric power by constituting in such a manner that power generator resistance force resists so as to assist with the rotation of an idler wheel and changing the resistance force into inertia force and the idler wheel weight controls. An idler wheel is fixed on an attachment at the center of a small gear. A large gear having a diameter double that of the small gear, an angle wheel, and an idler wheel gear are attached to both ends.

With mechanical gears and/or fly-wheel type arrangement, mechanical advantages may be accomplished and/or inertia may be overcome, but with no energy multiplication.

Here is another report from Ted Carnes dated:May 27, 1993
http://www.onegift4power.org/Reports05.html

It is somewhat long but it gives some details about the mechanics of Dantes invention.

[Navi-gator]

McGraw-Hill states: Physical Law:

?A physical phenomenon is said to be controlled or governed by a physical law when the phenomenon is one of a broad class of phenomenon such that it is possible to formulate some regularity which applies to all members of the class.?

Then it continues on a little further on:

?It is implicit in the notion of physical law that there are no exceptions, and unlike law made by humans, it may not be ?violated?. For example, by redefining the limits of it?s application, or by recasting it to encompass the phenomena?


Does this sound like, when anyone tries to break their unbreakable laws, that science simply changes the law? Or as Dr. Richard Olenick stated, in part: ?Dante found gaps in our understanding of mechanics."

Galileo was hung for his beliefs later realised as fact.

Cannot anyone find gaps in the present understanding of mechanics? Is mechanics so absolute that no one can find gaps in them? Does Newton?s ?Mechanica?, written three centuries ago, hold up that well?

Dante was validated by two experts of science, one in physics and one in ME , why do people who have never seen his work think he is a fraud?