Stanley Meyer replication with low input power

[dankie]

Grumpy,

I figured out another piece of the puzzle.

See this schematic - http://www.overunity.com/index.php?topic=3079.msg152443#msg152443

I think that is a magnetic particle separator - the atoms ARE magnetic. The delrin was specified to resist corrosion along with the SS 304.

The whole SS wire thing is bullshit like you said. Meyer was clearly trying to throw people off and there are more rumors and false claims about Meyer than you can throw a stick at.

I had a guy in my forum figure it out within hours of me and you. Weird huh? He didn't know the exact chemistry term but was on to the process.

I have reverse engineered a lot of free energy devices in my long life but Meyer was without a doubt the toughest. I don't think much of Stan Meyer anymore and doubt he is dead. Based on how much disinfo. he was putting out there, I'm guessing he sold out and is pretending to be a twin brother.

I have most of the gas generator built and I'm building the particle separator tomorrow. I have a pond fogger for a cavitation source and a mercury vapor light will supply the ultraviolet and can be had by breaking the outer glass envelope off a a gas discharge lamp that contains argon for UV filtering and that should be all it takes to replicate Meyer's final design.

An extender for a spark plug will take care of the injector and I bought the tap and die set a while back to do that - pretty much set to replicate the whole process now.

The IR LEDS were to destroy any particles that went past the separator. Meyer would have had to pass pollution control laws so that was a necessary part of the process.

Lies !!!!!!! Show us your work !!!

Are people so dumb these days that they think we believe their pathetic little lies ? You never replicated squat , you never tried replicating anything , you never even wound a coil in your life ...

I just enjoy reading this stuff , its almost as if you really believed your BS hypothesis was true ...

[Grumpy]

It's the electron deficent oxygen atoms that are pulling the Atomized
water droplets apart. Furthermore, electrically charged liquid fuel
droplets resist coalescing into larger droplets, thereby permitting
the fuel to be mixed more thoroghly with the air. In our case the
liquid fuel is water, the unstable oxygen atoms want the hydrogen
atoms more than the oxygen atom already attached to the hydrogen atoms
do and have the nessasary energy to take them. 4 H-O (459 kJ/mol)
bonds are broken taking 1836 kJ/mol to do so. That is the energy
required to break the bonds of the water molecule. The unstable oxygen
atoms have more than enough energy to pull the water apart and
recomine with them once sparked or heat ignited. Lets us look at just
oxygen, since it is the most important part of the reaction, here are
the energy levels of oxygen:
1st 1313.9 kJ/mol
2nd 3388.3 kJ/mol
3rd 5300.5 kJ/mol
4th 7469.2 kJ/mol
5th 10909.5 kJ/mol
6th 13326.5 kJ/mol
7th 71330.0 kJ/mol
8th 84078.0 kJ/mol
Now the 1st level doesn't have enough energy to pull the water
molecule apart but the 2nd level and beyond does. Once Stanley Meyer
figured this out he did away with the WFC, and in doing so allowed
him to use any water source as fuel, plus cut the cost way down. The
hydrogen is not being altered in this reaction it has been left at the
ground state, and this saves energy for it takes 13.6 eV to raise
hydrogen to its's 1st energy level, and it takes 10.3 eV to raise
oxygen to it's 8th energy level. So, as you can see it is wise to
leave the hydrogen atoms alone and focuse all of our attention on the
oxygen atoms. Also note we don't need to raise the oxygen to it's 8th
energy level but if done like Stanley Meyer did it to its' 4th energy
level.

This reaction is a ionic reaction, thus falls in the realm of
chemistry not physics. The reason you can't find it in any books is
they don't include any reactions of ions that are unstable and thus
have a short life time. But in the table of elements they do put in a
lot of atoms that have short life times. That is why the science guys
don't understand this for, lack of a better word, they half assed the
work needed too be done.

My aim for each and every one of us is to be the teachers of this
technology, and too spread this technology in your comunities thus
kicking off the energy revolution. Remember the more that know the
less likely you are too be become a target.

Hope this helps,
h2opower.

@ Buzz,

Prime the air too.  Hint. Hint.

gtnt + primed air + primed mist

Let me know if this doesn't "click" ina few seconds.

[Grumpy]

I had a guy in my forum figure it out within hours of me and you. Weird huh? He didn't know the exact chemistry term but was on to the process.

I have reverse engineered a lot of free energy devices in my long life but Meyer was without a doubt the toughest. I don't think much of Stan Meyer anymore and doubt he is dead. Based on how much disinfo. he was putting out there, I'm guessing he sold out and is pretending to be a twin brother.

I have most of the gas generator built and I'm building the particle separator tomorrow. I have a pond fogger for a cavitation source and a mercury vapor light will supply the ultraviolet and can be had by breaking the outer glass envelope off a a gas discharge lamp that contains argon for UV filtering and that should be all it takes to replicate Meyer's final design.

An extender for a spark plug will take care of the injector and I bought the tap and die set a while back to do that - pretty much set to replicate the whole process now.

The IR LEDS were to destroy any particles that went past the separator. Meyer would have had to pass pollution control laws so that was a necessary part of the process.

Low pressure murcury lamp is specifically specified by some sources, but there are other "methods".

You have to use the right methods to get the right results - "close" will not work and you will get something else.

Your friend makes one more to see it.

No, I do not think Stan is dead - probably got an offer he couldn't refuse.

[IronHead]

Danky agreed to work on one thread with one group of selected people on the EBN forum .The EBN forum has many many levels of access and there are many groups that work within these different levels based on there understanding and builds they are working. Stevie also only saw the levels of the forum that his group was assigned to and agreed upon. The problem is that danky nor stevie built the trust of  others to go any further on the forum than agreed upon . It is the long term members that make the decisions on the EBN forum. Both and many others that have had bad attitudes never make it beyond the trial threads and are normally removed, and sometimes they remove themselfs because friendships are not built out of disrespect. This is the way my forum works and is agreed upon before one even steps into my private forum. The private forum is based on invitation only.  Although we do have a public forum as well that is very new and building quickly. The same system is also applied to the public forum for those that do not have respect of others , they will simply be removed. 

As far as this forum goes it looks as though if danky keeps up his disrespect. Well we will see as we are a bit more forgiving here, but there are limits

I feel that OU.com has a great deal to offer as an open forum once you understand the way it operates and can look past some of the nonconstructive activity that does go on.

Now back to the thread at hand and please forgive me for interrupting. This will be my last post on this thread.

Thank you
IronHead

[Farlander]

 I agree with Ironhead that too much drama plagues these forums.  Please people...
I work hard on my Meyers replication.  I've put in 11 months now and countless hours.  I want to share and learn everything that I can with whoever is mature enough to listen and smart enough to reply. I come up with new ideas hourly, since Meyers pretty much dominates my mind.  This is the most serious thing in my life.

I'll be posting in a new thread