Stanley Meyer replication with low input power

[fever16]

Hello all (Hi HHO)
This is my first post here.(Got pretty impressed and motivated towards WFC after coming to this forum.thank you all or bringing up your respective findings and sharing with the rest of word.)
i saw all the "available" videos thru youtube and red different threads.may be here i might did some thing wrong.i red too many posts that cause lot of confusion.each person has his own way of working and his won circuit.so when i plan to begin i don't understand from where i should start.so i need some help from you guys.i hope you don't mind.

.....after going thru all the data(if i understand concept right),when a pulsed DC energy passed thru step up transformer and thru the respective inductors to WFC,it will generate enough gas by drawing very low current.of course the electrical resonance between the WFC and inductors has to be same.
1.so can i get a simple setup transformer from shop and use here?
2.is this resonance method work for plates too?
3.what is the best replacement for BUZ350
4.when i looked at RAVI's inductors they are quite lengthy.may be 100mm (am i reading right?)
5.what is the best turns and values of transformer and inductors achieved so far?
6.STANLEY's patent shows variable inductor.but i don't see any model,which uses this function
7.As per the picture in patent,the stepup transformer coil and inductors are on same core.is it possible to do that.if yes,then how?
pls help me guys.so that i can clear my mind and work more towards creating a better WFC.
thanks

*i made a picture(sorry for the quality) that focus on my doubts.

[slider1]

Thank you for the updated PDF info!!!! 

I just want to put in my cents...the bifilar coil DOES make more gas...It is a MUST!!!! I would say that my gas production almost doubled with it and kept the amps at the same spot.

Altough...my coil looks nothing like Ravi's.....

What does your coil look like? Glad to see you working on this too!

[slowerlower]

This may be a stupid question.  Tesla theorized that all life resonates between 6 and 8 hz.  So if we are working on a way to break or fracture the hydrogen bond by way of resonance, than couldn't that also mean that this device could also be tuned to destroy that bond in DNA as well?

This then could create a mere perfect weapon.  Silent and unforgiving, vaporizing life before one could prepare their last prayers.  This would or could create world government bent on fear, enslaving us deeper under a tyrannical thumb.

As with all great ideas someone somehow finds a way to pervert it and cause harm greater than ever imagined previously.

Please understand I am not against this technology in any way.  In fact I am building my first hho gen.  A very simple design, nothing serious yet.  But with results and news spreading has there been any talk or discussion to the degree in which this technology can be taken. 

I no longer feel that we are able to create technology without considering not only the good but the evil, that new ideas or technology could bring .  Consider only the quaint, kind, professor that the morning he heard the news of the Atom bomb being dropped he said nothing but "Oh my God"  because the bombed used his equation to fuel its theory, and on top of that it was speculated that the bombs never needed to be dropped to end the war.

Free energy could save us in poverty, but could it in any way be used to tighten our shackles.  please consider and respond

Thank You

[kinesisfilms]

why are there so many idiots on these forums?

[slowerlower]

Idiot? perhaps.  But you failed to provide any type of arguement that would dispute this claim.  Consider that water may onl be the starting point .  Has this method of electolysis been attempted with any other liquids.  a possible change may need to be made to the tubes because a different liquid may decompose diferently causing the tubes to breakdown.  but could it be done? 

How unfortunate it is that when one asks a question - they get harrassed and belittled.  One, on the other hand, should get used to quesstions oef all types, because in a free energy society free thought and ideas could replace oppression.  After all isn't that the ultimate goal to advance us past the need for agression.

I apologize if my question has offended - but has the final end been considered or have we failed once again to see how a noble cause could be retrofitted to create more destruction.