Stanley Meyer replication with low input power

[HeairBear]

I mean no disrespect, but, I have to question all of my sources. You are one of those sources and I must question you to better understand my quest for knowledge. Your responses are inspiring, only tinged with mysticism and the trust of your word which I cannot accept after replicating the works and beyond. So, let's talk shop! What Tesla technology is at work here? The bifilar chokes? How are they connected and why? Why do Stan's drawings and pictures of the "Rotary Pulsed Generator" demoed in all videos show only a variable transformer, un-regulated alternator, electric motor, and tube cell array? No PWM, no chokes. The "Electrical Polarization Process Resonant Charging Choke Circuit" was a totally different device with a variable spacing of two plates, not tubes. Also, Stan shows his chokes wired in a non-inductive manner where the magnetic field would be canceled.

     Is Ravi's or Dave's previous works non-functional and we are waiting for you to release the actual diagrams? I don't' understand why you say the info is coming, but, we should have had it already in the previous releases. What is so crucial to the design that we all have over looked? When people hide the truth, I smell doodoo! Sniff, sniff... Do you smell that? What are we waiting for? The real diagrams? There is not much left to hide in this replication, or should I say recreation of Stan's work. Compare the diagrams and judge for yourself. I can see absolutely no resemblance to Stan's work. None... If RAVI is an expert metallurgist, why is his electronics being highlighted? Is he an electronics engineer too? What does metallurgy have to do with it?

     I'm sorry I have so many questions, but, most of this seems like hype. I'm waiting for the info, till then, I'm not holding my breath. I have been down this road and it leads to two people who are crying wolf. Where is the wolf?

[ashtweth_nihilisti]

No mysticism in this doc, it shows you how to connect the Chokes
http://rapidshare.com/files/131258913/Ravi_Cell.pdf.html

>Why Stan's drawings and pictures of the "Rotary Pulsed Generator"

The same reason why EVGRAY drew his his way, (i cannot tell its not of relevance here)

> Is Ravi's or Dave's previous works non-functional and we are waiting for you to release the actual diagrams? I don't' understand why you say the info is coming,

All info you need is in the document, the panacea university site is back up, we are updating the RAVI doc with our experimental findings.

>What is so crucial to the design that we all have over looked?

Every thing in that document

>f RAVI is an expert metallurgist, why is his electronics being highlighted? Is he an electronics engineer too? What does metallurgy have to do with it?

He has been able to analyze the metal  and comment on the conditioning progress which Aaron confirmed, plus other things listed on the document.

Every thing you have to get started is in that document, if you have doubt, then i cannot convince you.

Ash

[insane4evr]

No mysticism in this doc, it shows you how to connect the Chokes
http://rapidshare.com/files/131258913/Ravi_Cell.pdf.html

>Why Stan's drawings and pictures of the "Rotary Pulsed Generator"

The same reason why EVGRAY drew his his way, (i cannot tell its not of relevance here)

> Is Ravi's or Dave's previous works non-functional and we are waiting for you to release the actual diagrams? I don't' understand why you say the info is coming,

All info you need is in the document, the panacea university site is back up, we are updating the RAVI doc with our experimental findings.

>What is so crucial to the design that we all have over looked?

Every thing in that document

>f RAVI is an expert metallurgist, why is his electronics being highlighted? Is he an electronics engineer too? What does metallurgy have to do with it?

He has been able to analyze the metal  and comment on the conditioning progress which Aaron confirmed, plus other things listed on the document.

Every thing you have to get started is in that document, if you have doubt, then i cannot convince you.

Ash

Ash,

Thanks for that Ravi_Cell document. It answered a lot of questions for me on the conditioning process.
Can I assume that during conditioning, operating currents listed can be adjusted directly proportional to the surface area?
For example: Using Ravi's inner tube dimension of 3/4 inch dia., 9 inches long and 9 tubes comes out to be ~190 sq. inches.
If flat plates are used with an effective area of 380 sq. inches being conditioned, then I just double the listed conditioning currents?

TIA

[mostrander]

Has Ravi or anybody with a successfully Stanley replication taken any measurements with an oscilloscope?

[ashtweth_nihilisti]

insane4evr

Okay, the best criteria as stated in the doc, is to do LOW amp conditioning, WHY? The coat is most likely to stick better. The magic number is .02 amps. dont Do high amp conditioning no matter what size tubes.

Still to the one listed in there regardless.

Now as for the oscilloscope, Dave showed the Square waves coming off yes. Naudin (JLN labs) did one i think. I can as soon as ours is ready.

Ash